Texas Education Agency
Performance Reporting
TPRS Home
2015-16 Texas Performance Reporting System
 
Report for:CHINA SPRING INT
Campus ID:161920104Total Students:615
District:CHINA SPRING ISDGrade Span:04 - 06

 
STAAR Performance Results - TAPR Student Groups
(Students in the accountability subset)
Printable Version

  State District Campus African
American
Hispanic White American
Indian
Asian Pacific
Islander
Two or
More
Races
Special
Ed
Econ
Disadv
ELL
STAAR Percent At or Above Level II Satisfactory Standard (2016) or Phase-in Satisfactory Standard (2015)
    Grade 4
      Reading 2016 75% 88% 88% 71% 84% 90% - * - * 54% 77% *
  2015 72% 88% 88% 100% 79% 89% - * - * 58% 76% *
 
      Mathematics 2016 73% 87% 87% 71% 81% 89% - * - * 50% 69% *
  2015 72% 90% 90% 86% 83% 92% - * - * 47% 78% *
 
      Writing 2016 69% 84% 84% 86% 77% 84% - * - * 58% 69% *
  2015 68% 84% 84% 100% 79% 84% - * - * 37% 69% *
 
STAAR Percent At or Above Level II Satisfactory Standard (2016) or Phase-in Satisfactory Standard (2015)
    Grade 5 **
      Reading 2016 81% 93% 93% 100% 91% 93% - * - * 55% 85% *
  2015 84% 91% 91% 100% 97% 90% - * * * 38% 84% *
 
      Mathematics 2016 86% 93% 93% 100% 94% 93% - * - * 45% 85% *
  2015 77% 81% 81% 86% 67% 85% - * * * * 71% *
 
      Science 2016 74% 85% 85% 90% 85% 86% - * - * 50% 73% *
  2015 70% 87% 87% 100% 80% 89% - * * * 44% 85% *
 
STAAR Percent At or Above Level II Satisfactory Standard (2016) or Phase-in Satisfactory Standard (2015)
    Grade 6
      Reading 2016 69% 78% 78% 78% 78% 79% - * - * 36% 63% *
  2015 74% 88% 88% 73% 97% 87% * * - * 50% 80% *
 
      Mathematics 2016 72% 79% 79% 78% 75% 82% - * - * 20% 67% *
  2015 73% 88% 88% 82% 77% 91% * * - * 41% 76% *
 
STAAR Percent At or Above Level II Satisfactory Standard (2016) or Phase-in Satisfactory Standard (2015)
    All Grades
      All Subjects 2016 75% 86% 86% 86% 83% 87% - 67% - 77% 46% 75% 50%
  2015 74% 86% 87% 89% 82% 89% * 64% * 92% 43% 77% *
 
      Reading 2016 73% 86% 86% 85% 84% 88% - * - 75% 48% 76% *
  2015 75% 89% 89% 88% 92% 89% * * * 100% 49% 80% *
 
      Mathematics 2016 76% 88% 87% 85% 83% 88% - * - 67% 38% 75% *
  2015 74% 86% 87% 84% 75% 90% * * * * 39% 75% *
 
      Writing 2016 69% 83% 84% 86% 77% 84% - * - * 58% 69% *
  2015 69% 82% 84% 100% 79% 84% - * - * 37% 69% *
 
      Science 2016 79% 88% 85% 90% 85% 86% - * - * 50% 73% *
  2015 76% 85% 87% 100% 80% 89% - * * * 44% 85% *
 
STAAR Percent at Postsecondary Readiness Standard
    All Grades
      Two or More Subjects 2016 45% 55% 49% 27% 40% 52% - * - 42% 13% 35% *
  2015 41% 53% 48% 28% 26% 54% * * * * * 29% *
 
      Reading 2016 46% 57% 52% 38% 42% 55% - * - 42% 16% 35% *
  2015 44% 58% 52% 28% 33% 57% * * * * 18% 36% *
 
      Mathematics 2016 43% 56% 53% 42% 41% 56% - * - 42% 12% 37% *
  2015 38% 51% 53% 56% 39% 56% * * * * * 33% *
 
      Writing 2016 41% 53% 53% * 48% 54% - * - * * 40% *
  2015 33% 44% 44% * 33% 45% - * - * * 26% *
 
      Science 2016 47% 59% 54% * 48% 55% - * - * 32% 36% *
  2015 42% 53% 51% * 37% 57% - * * * * 35% *
 
STAAR Percent at Advanced Standard
    All Grades
      All Subjects 2016 18% 22% 23% 16% 15% 26% - * - 19% 8% 13% *
  2015 15% 21% 24% 16% 14% 26% * * * * 4% 11% *
 
      Reading 2016 17% 21% 24% 19% 19% 25% - * - * 10% 16% *
  2015 16% 23% 29% 12% 19% 31% 0% 40% 0% 40% 4% 16% 0%
 
      Mathematics 2016 19% 23% 26% 19% 15% 29% - * - * * 13% *
  2015 16% 20% 25% 16% 14% 28% 0% 40% 0% 20% 5% 10% 0%
 
      Writing 2016 15% 16% 20% * 16% 21% - * - * * * *
  2015 9% 12% 11% 43% 0% 12% - 0% - 0% 0% 3% 0%
 
      Science 2016 16% 24% 19% * * 22% - * - * * 10% *
  2015 15% 23% 18% 0% 10% 22% - 0% 0% 0% 6% 8% 0%
 
STAAR Percent Met or Exceeded Progress
    All Grades
      All Subjects 2016 62% 60% 61% 62% 59% 61% - * - * 55% 55% *
 
      Reading 2016 60% 55% 56% 65% 52% 56% - * - * 47% 49% *
  2015 59% 60% 60% * 63% 62% * * * * 46% 57% *
 
      Mathematics 2016 63% 64% 66% 58% 66% 66% - * - * 63% 61% *
 
STAAR Percent Exceeded Progress
    All Grades
      All Subjects 2016 17% 13% 15% 25% 16% 14% - * - * 9% 14% *
 
      Reading 2016 16% 12% 14% 23% 15% 14% - * - * 10% 14% *
  2015 16% 19% 24% * 22% 25% * * * * 21% 18% *
 
      Mathematics 2016 17% 13% 16% 27% 16% 15% - * - * 7% 14% *
 
Progress of Prior-Year Non-Proficient Students
    Sum of Grades 4-8
      Reading 2016 35% 35% 32% * 45% 29% - * - - * 27% *
  2015 39% 51% 42% * 67% 37% - * * * * 29% *
 

Student Success Initiative

   Grade 5 Reading

     Students Meeting Level II Standard (2016) or Phase-in Satisfactory Standard (2015) on First STAAR Administration
  2016 73% 88% 88% 90% 88% 89% - * - * 50% 78% *
  2015 75% 86% 86% 100% 87% 86% - * * * * 78% *

     Students Requiring Accelerated Instruction
  2016 27% 12% 12% * * 11% - * - * 50% 22% *
  2015 25% 14% 14% * * 14% - * * * 75% 22% *

     STAAR Cumulative Met Standard
  2016 80% 93% 93% 100% 91% 93% - * - * 55% 85% *
  2015 84% 91% 91% 100% 97% 90% - * * * 38% 84% *

     STAAR Non-Proficient Students Promoted by Grade Placement Committee
  2014 92% * * * * * - - - - * * -


     STAAR Met Standard (Non-Proficient in Previous Year)
     Promoted to Grade 6
  2015 14% * * * - * - - - - * * -


     Retained in Grade 5
  2015 59% * * - * * - - - - * * -

   Grade 5 Mathematics

     Students Meeting Level II Standard on First STAAR Administration
  2016 77% 86% 86% 90% 85% 87% - * - * 41% 73% *

     Students Requiring Accelerated Instruction
  2016 23% 14% 14% * 15% 13% - * - * 59% 27% *

     STAAR Cumulative Met Standard
  2016 85% 93% 93% 100% 94% 93% - * - * 45% 85% *
 
 
  '*'     Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
 '**'     Indicates that the 2015 and 2016 rates for reading and the 2016 rate for mathematics are based on the cumulative results from
          the first and second administrations of STAAR. No retests were administered for mathematics,  grades 5 and 8, in 2015.
 '?'     Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable or were reported outside a reasonable range.
 '-'      Indicates zero observations reported for this group.
'n/a'   Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.