Texas Education Agency
2014-15 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools
Campus Name:
Campus ID: 101917004bit.ly/20mNyfx
District Name:

Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level

This section provides the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) performance results for each subject area and grade level tested in the 2014-15 school year. These results include all students tested, whether or not they were in the accountability subset.


There is no data for this campus.

 
 
Part II: Student Achievement and State Academic Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs)

This section provides the STAAR performance results for each subject area tested in the 2014-15 school year. These results only include tested students who were in the accountability subset. This section also includes four-year and five-year graduation rates and participation rates on STAAR for reading and mathematics.


Source: 2015 Accountability Federal System Safeguards Report
 
 
 
Part III: Priority and Focus Schools

Priority schools are the lowest 5% of Title I served campuses based on performance in reading, mathematics and graduation rates. Priority schools include Tier I or Tier II TTIPS schools, campuses with graduation rates less than 60%, and lowest achieving campuses based on All Students reading/math performance.Focus schools are 10% of Title I served campuses, not already identified as priority schools, that have the widest gaps between student group performance and safeguard targets. Campuses are ranked based on the largest gaps between student group reading/math performance and the annual measurable objectives (AMO) target of 75%.


A high-performance reward school is identified as a Title I school with distinctions based on reading and math performance. In addition, at the high school level, a reward school is a Title I school with the highest graduation rates. A high progress school is identified as a Title I school in the top 25% in annual improvement; and/or a school in the top 25% of those demonstrating ability to close performance gaps based on system safeguards.


Source: TEA Division of School Improvement and Support
 
 
 
Part IV: Teacher Quality Data

Part IV A: Percent of Teachers by Highest Degree Held
Professional qualifications of all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the State of Texas. The distribution of degrees attained by teachers are shown as the percent of total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) count of teachers with no degree, bachelorís, masterís, and doctorate degrees.


Part IV B and C: Teachers with Emergency/Provisional Credentials, Highly Qualified (HQ) Teachers Low Poverty/ High Poverty Summary Reports
The percentage of all public elementary and secondary school teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes in the state not taught by highly qualified teachers disaggregated by high-poverty compared to low-poverty schools. For this purpose, high-poverty means schools in the top quartile of poverty and low-poverty means the bottom quartile of poverty in the state.

 

Core Academic Subject Areas

Report Not Required

Number of Core Academic Teachers Who Are Teaching on the Following Permits

Report Not Required

Number of Core Academic Teachers with a Probationary Certificate Enrolled in an Alternative Certification

Report Not Required
 
 

Source: TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy
 
 
 
Part V: Graduates Enrolled in Texas Institution of Higher Education (IHE)

This section provides the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year (fall or spring semester) following high school graduation. The rate reflects the percent of total graduates during the 2011-12 school year who attended a public or independent college or university in Texas in the 2012-13 academic year.


Report Not Required
 
 

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
 
 
 
Part VI: Statewide National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Results

The most recent NAEP results for Texas are provided showing statewide reading and mathematics performance results and participation rates, disaggregated by student group.


State Level: 2015 Percentages at NAEP Achievement Levels

Grade Subject Student Group %
Below Basic
%
At or Above
Basic
%
At or Above
Proficient
%
At or Above
Advanced
Grade 4 Reading Overall 36 64 31 7
    American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a
    Asian 13 87 66 30
    Black 49 51 17 2
    Hispanic 44 56 22 3
    White 18 82 50 13
    Students with Disabilities 71 29 11 2
    English Language Learners 59 41 12 2
    National School Lunch Program 46 54 20 3
 
  Mathematics Overall 14 86 44 8
    American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a
    Asian 3 97 82 36
    Black 24 76 29 2
    Hispanic 16 84 37 4
    White 7 93 60 15
    Students with Disabilities 41 59 18 2
    English Language Learners 23 77 28 2
    National School Lunch Program 19 81 30 2
 
Grade 8 Reading Overall 28 72 28 2
    American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a
    Asian 12 88 55 12
    Black 38 62 19 2
    Hispanic 35 65 19 1
    White 14 86 43 4
    Students with Disabilities 70 30 5 n/a
    English Language Learners 71 29 2 n/a
    National School Lunch Program 36 64 18 1
 
  Mathematics Overall 25 75 32 7
    American Indian n/a n/a n/a n/a
    Asian 5 95 67 25
    Black 43 57 16 2
    Hispanic 31 69 23 4
    White 12 88 48 12
    Students with Disabilities 62 38 8 1
    English Language Learners 60 40 6 n/a
    National School Lunch Program 34 66 20 3
 

State Level: 2015 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students

Grade Subject Student Group %
Grade 4 Reading Students with Disabilities 72
    Limited English Proficient 92
 
  Mathematics Students with Disabilities 80
    Limited English Proficient 95
 
Grade 8 Reading Students with Disabilities 81
    Limited English Proficient 95
 
  Mathematics Students with Disabilities 81
    Limited English Proficient 90
 

Source: TEA Division of Student Assessment