November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 1
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LAREDO District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 240901
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
District rating limited to ACADEMICALLY ACCEPTABLE due to having one or more Academically Unacceptable campuses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS (TAKS) TABLE
Required Status
|------------- 2010 -------------||--------- 2009 ---------||----- Improvement -----||-------- 2010 TPM -------|----- by Measure -----|
Number Pct Stu Number Pct Met Number Pct
Performance Met Number Met Grp Met Number Met Min Act Met Met Std Number Met
Results Std Taking Std % Std Taking Std Size Chg RI RI? w/TPM Taking w/TPM STD RI TPM EXCP ***
Reading/ELA (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 9,831 12,617 78% 100% 9,325 13,109 71% Yes 7 5 Yes 11,162 12,617 88% AA RE - - RE
African Amer * * 80% * * * 71% 9 * * > 99% - - - - -
Hispanic 9,772 12,549 78% 99% 9,266 13,042 71% Yes 7 5 Yes 11,097 12,549 88% AA RE - - RE
White * * 84% 0% 35 39 90% -6 * * 95% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 9,513 12,240 78% 97% 9,019 12,746 71% Yes 7 5 Yes 10,822 12,240 88% AA RE - - RE
Writing (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 2,630 3,011 87% 100% 2,586 3,043 85% 2 2,794 3,011 93% RE RE EX - EX
African Amer * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Hispanic 2,620 3,000 87% 100% 2,567 3,023 85% 2 2,783 3,000 93% RE RE EX - EX
White * * > 99% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 2,547 2,923 87% 97% 2,514 2,963 85% 2 2,708 2,923 93% RE RE EX - EX
Social Studies (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 3,122 3,477 90% 100% 3,098 3,746 83% 7 3,412 3,477 98% EX - - - EX
African Amer * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Hispanic 3,099 3,453 90% 99% 3,076 3,723 83% 7 3,388 3,453 98% EX - - - EX
White * * 94% * * * 94% 0 * * > 99% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 2,995 3,340 90% 96% 2,999 3,636 82% 8 3,279 3,340 98% EX - - - EX
Mathematics (60%/80%/90%)
All Students 9,241 12,605 73% 100% 8,507 13,103 65% Yes 8 ** No 10,342 12,605 82% AA AA RE - RE
African Amer * * 60% * * * 71% -11 * * 80% - - - - -
Hispanic 9,184 12,537 73% 99% 8,448 13,035 65% Yes 8 ** No 10,282 12,537 82% AA AA RE - RE
White 29 37 78% 0% 33 40 83% -5 30 37 81% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 8,955 12,228 73% 97% 8,236 12,732 65% Yes 8 ** No 10,025 12,228 82% AA AA RE - RE
Science (55%/80%/90%)
All Students 3,315 5,072 65% 100% 2,928 5,329 55% Yes 10 ** No 4,111 5,072 81% AA AA RE - RE
African Amer * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Hispanic 3,287 5,038 65% 99% 2,905 5,301 55% Yes 10 ** No 4,080 5,038 81% AA AA RE - RE
White 16 21 76% 0% 15 20 75% 1 18 21 86% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 3,192 4,900 65% 97% 2,817 5,166 55% Yes 10 ** No 3,963 4,900 81% AA AA RE - RE
** Met the minimum size requirement, but did not meet the 75% floor for Recognized.
*** Summary column: Note that RI, TPM, and EXCP may elevate the rating one level, but only one level.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXCEPTIONS TABLE
Number Msrs Number Number Floor(s) Msr(s) Used
Evaluated Allowed Needed Met? in 2009? Exceptions Applied
15 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 2
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LAREDO District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 240901
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
District rating limited to ACADEMICALLY ACCEPTABLE due to having one or more Academically Unacceptable campuses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
COMPLETION RATE I TABLE (Gr. 9-12) (75.0%/85.0%/95.0%)
Required
|----------- Class of 2009 ------------||--- Class of 2008 ----||------ Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# Com- # # in Comp Grp # Com- # in Comp Min Act Met
pleters Dropouts Class Rate % pleters Class Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 1,119 181 1,306 85.7% 100% 1,049 1,199 87.5% -1.8
African Amer * * * * 0% * 3 * *
Hispanic 1,103 181 1,290 85.5% 99% 1,036 1,184 87.5% -2.0
White 12 0 12 100.0% 1% 8 10 80.0% 20.0
Econ Disadv 1,046 150 1,202 87.0% 92% 1,014 1,148 88.3% -1.3
Decreases in completion rates may be due to significant changes in the dropout definition
beginning with the 2005-06 school year.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE TABLE (Gr. 7-8) (1.8%)
Required
|------------ 2008-09 -------------||--------- 2007-08 ---------||----- Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# # 7-8 Dropout Grp # # 7-8 Dropout Min Act Met
Dropouts Graders Rate % Dropouts Graders Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 13 3,530 0.4% 100% 24 3,636 0.7% -0.3
African Amer * 3 * 0% * 3 * *
Hispanic 13 3,512 0.4% 99% 23 3,620 0.6% -0.2
White 0 11 0.0% 0% 0 11 0.0% 0.0
Econ Disadv 10 3,047 0.3% 86% 14 3,304 0.4% -0.1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 3
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LAREDO District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 240901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Summary of Gold Performance Acknowledgments
Earned 2 acknowledgment(s) out of 13 evaluated.
Advanced Courses NQ Commended Reading/ELA NQ
AP/IB NQ Commended Mathematics NQ
Attendance Rate ++ Commended Writing NQ
College-Ready NQ Commended Science NQ
RHSP/DAP ++ Commended Social Studies NQ
SAT/ACT NQ TSI ELA NQ
TSI Mathematics NQ
++ = Acknowledged; NQ = Does Not Qualify; Blank = Not Applicable
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
w/Credit for w/Credit for Student w/Credit for
Student Groups an Advanced Any Group Advanced
Course Course Percent Courses
All Students 1,289 5,881 100% 21.9%
African American * 3 0% *
Hispanic 1,264 5,837 99% 21.7%
White 19 35 1% 54.3%
Economically Disadvantaged 1,231 5,451 93% 22.6%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
AP/IB Results (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking 11th and Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups AP and/ 12th Group AP and/ Above AP and/ Above
or IB Graders Percent or IB Criterion or IB Criterion
All Students 465 2,211 100% 21.0% 77 465 16.6%
African American * * 0% * * * *
Hispanic 454 2,189 99% 20.7% 76 454 16.7%
White 8 16 1% 50.0% 0 8 0.0%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 4
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LAREDO District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 240901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attendance Rate (2008-09): ACKNOWLEDGED
Total Days
Absent + Student
Student Groups Total Total Days Group Attendance
Days Present Present Percent Rate
All Students 3,332,825 3,459,995 100% 96.3%
African American 1,561 1,595 0% 97.9%
Hispanic 3,315,974 3,442,707 100% 96.3%
White 9,830 10,178 0% 96.6%
Economically Disadvantaged 3,182,943 3,302,405 95% 96.4%
Attendance Rate standard for your acknowledgment is 96.0%.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Scoring Number Percent Scoring
At or Above Taking Student At or Above
Student Groups Criteria on Both ELA Group Criteria on
Both ELA & Math & Math Percent Both ELA & Math
All Students 289 931 100% 31%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 281 917 98% 31%
White 5 10 1% 50%
Economically Disadvantaged 275 892 96% 31%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Reading/ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 2,209 12,617 100% 18%
African American * * * < 1%
Hispanic 2,186 12,549 99% 17%
White 9 * 0% 24%
Economically Disadvantaged 2,122 12,240 97% 17%
Reading includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 5
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LAREDO District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 240901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 2,297 12,605 100% 18%
African American * * * < 1%
Hispanic 2,277 12,537 99% 18%
White 7 37 0% 19%
Economically Disadvantaged 2,211 12,228 97% 18%
Mathematics includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Writing: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 578 3,011 100% 19%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 571 3,000 100% 19%
White * * * 67%
Economically Disadvantaged 543 2,923 97% 19%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Science: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 648 5,072 100% 13%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 637 5,038 99% 13%
White * 21 0% 10%
Economically Disadvantaged 620 4,900 97% 13%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 6
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LAREDO District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 240901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Social Studies: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 870 3,477 100% 25%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 858 3,453 99% 25%
White 8 * * 44%
Economically Disadvantaged 824 3,340 96% 25%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/DAP (Class of 2009): ACKNOWLEDGED
Percent
Rec. Student Completing
Student Groups HS Pgm. Total Group Rec.
Graduates Graduates Percent HS Pgm.
All Students 990 1,068 100% 92.7%
African American * * 0% *
Hispanic 977 1,054 99% 92.7%
White 10 10 1% 100.0%
Economically Disadvantaged 940 1,013 95% 92.8%
The count of RHSP graduates includes Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) graduates.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 7
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LAREDO District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 240901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
SAT/ACT Results (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking Non-Special Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups SAT and/ Education Group SAT and/ Above SAT and/ Above
or ACT Graduates Percent or ACT Criterion or ACT Criterion
All Students 609 918 100% 66.3% 35 609 5.7%
African American 0 0 0% - 0 0 -
Hispanic 594 905 99% 65.6% 30 594 5.1%
White 10 10 1% 100.0% 1 10 10.0%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard ELA Percent Standard
All Students 439 1,045 100% 42%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 436 1,037 99% 42%
White 3 7 1% 43%
Economically Disadvantaged 424 999 96% 42%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard Mathematics Percent Standard
All Students 600 1,039 100% 58%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 596 1,031 99% 58%
White 3 7 1% 43%
Economically Disadvantaged 573 993 96% 58%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation of Masking Rules
2010 Accountability Manual
2010 Accountability
Performance Reporting