November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 1
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: BRENHAM District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 239901
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
District rating limited to ACADEMICALLY ACCEPTABLE due to having one or more Academically Unacceptable campuses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS (TAKS) TABLE
Required Status
|------------- 2010 -------------||--------- 2009 ---------||----- Improvement -----||-------- 2010 TPM -------|----- by Measure -----|
Number Pct Stu Number Pct Met Number Pct
Performance Met Number Met Grp Met Number Met Min Act Met Met Std Number Met
Results Std Taking Std % Std Taking Std Size Chg RI RI? w/TPM Taking w/TPM STD RI TPM EXCP ***
Reading/ELA (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 2,581 2,906 89% 100% 2,468 2,720 91% -2 2,772 2,906 95% RE RE EX - EX
African Amer 494 641 77% 22% 486 597 81% Yes -4 -1 No 579 641 90% AA AA RE - RE
Hispanic 521 609 86% 21% 454 521 87% -1 574 609 94% RE RE EX - EX
White 1,515 1,603 95% 55% 1,484 1,553 96% -1 1,567 1,603 98% EX - - - EX
Econ Disadv 1,123 1,375 82% 47% 959 1,140 84% -2 1,271 1,375 92% RE RE EX - EX
Writing (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 567 606 94% 100% 542 575 94% 0 593 606 98% EX - - - EX
African Amer 120 138 87% 23% 119 130 92% -5 133 138 96% RE RE EX - EX
Hispanic 118 129 91% 21% 114 124 92% -1 126 129 98% EX - - - EX
White 318 328 97% 54% 303 315 96% 1 323 328 98% EX - - - EX
Econ Disadv 269 301 89% 50% 244 267 91% -2 290 301 96% RE RE EX - EX
Social Studies (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 823 869 95% 100% 769 814 94% 1 861 869 99% EX - - - EX
African Amer * * 92% 21% 136 159 86% 6 * * 99% EX - - - EX
Hispanic 127 141 90% 16% 107 122 88% 2 138 141 98% EX - - - EX
White 514 532 97% 61% 511 516 99% -2 528 532 99% EX - - - EX
Econ Disadv 294 323 91% 37% 223 256 87% 4 319 323 99% EX - - - EX
Mathematics (60%/80%/90%)
All Students 2,524 2,887 87% 100% 2,403 2,704 89% -2 2,664 2,887 92% RE RE EX - EX
African Amer 485 640 76% 22% 452 590 77% Yes -1 2 No 534 640 83% AA AA RE - RE
Hispanic 503 607 83% 21% 448 524 85% -2 548 607 90% RE RE EX - EX
White 1,482 1,586 93% 55% 1,457 1,542 94% -1 1,528 1,586 96% EX - - - EX
Econ Disadv 1,094 1,370 80% 47% 935 1,137 82% -2 1,191 1,370 87% RE - - - RE
Science (55%/80%/90%)
All Students 1,059 1,168 91% 100% 941 1,113 85% 6 1,128 1,168 97% EX - - - EX
African Amer 183 235 78% 20% 134 213 63% Yes 15 9 Yes 216 235 92% AA RE - - RE
Hispanic 181 208 87% 18% 147 194 76% 11 195 208 94% RE RE EX - EX
White 677 706 96% 60% 640 684 94% 2 698 706 99% EX - - - EX
Econ Disadv 400 476 84% 41% 281 394 71% 13 442 476 93% RE RE EX - EX
.
*** Summary column: Note that RI, TPM, and EXCP may elevate the rating one level, but only one level.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXCEPTIONS TABLE
Number Msrs Number Number Floor(s) Msr(s) Used
Evaluated Allowed Needed Met? in 2009? Exceptions Applied
25 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 2
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: BRENHAM District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 239901
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
District rating limited to ACADEMICALLY ACCEPTABLE due to having one or more Academically Unacceptable campuses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
COMPLETION RATE I TABLE (Gr. 9-12) (75.0%/85.0%/95.0%)
Required
|----------- Class of 2009 ------------||--- Class of 2008 ----||------ Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# Com- # # in Comp Grp # Com- # in Comp Min Act Met
pleters Dropouts Class Rate % pleters Class Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 359 14 377 95.2% 100% 317 368 86.1% 9.1
African Amer 78 6 84 92.9% 22% 55 76 72.4% 20.5
Hispanic 49 4 54 90.7% 14% 36 45 80.0% 10.7
White 221 4 228 96.9% 60% 220 241 91.3% 5.6
Econ Disadv 94 10 104 90.4% 28% 79 108 73.1% 17.3
Decreases in completion rates may be due to significant changes in the dropout definition
beginning with the 2005-06 school year.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE TABLE (Gr. 7-8) (1.8%)
Required
|------------ 2008-09 -------------||--------- 2007-08 ---------||----- Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# # 7-8 Dropout Grp # # 7-8 Dropout Min Act Met
Dropouts Graders Rate % Dropouts Graders Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 1 723 0.1% 100% 0 737 0.0% 0.1
African Amer 0 181 0.0% 25% 0 172 0.0% 0.0
Hispanic 1 132 0.8% 18% 0 129 0.0% 0.8
White 0 399 0.0% 55% 0 422 0.0% 0.0
Econ Disadv 1 292 0.3% 40% 0 302 0.0% 0.3
Dropout data not evaluated for your accountability rating due to small numbers or no data.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 3
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: BRENHAM District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 239901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Summary of Gold Performance Acknowledgments
Earned 1 acknowledgment(s) out of 13 evaluated.
Advanced Courses NQ Commended Reading/ELA NQ
AP/IB NQ Commended Mathematics NQ
Attendance Rate NQ Commended Writing NQ
College-Ready NQ Commended Science NQ
RHSP/DAP NQ Commended Social Studies NQ
SAT/ACT NQ TSI ELA NQ
TSI Mathematics ++
++ = Acknowledged; NQ = Does Not Qualify; Blank = Not Applicable
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
w/Credit for w/Credit for Student w/Credit for
Student Groups an Advanced Any Group Advanced
Course Course Percent Courses
All Students 204 1,407 100% 14.5%
African American 9 329 23% 2.7%
Hispanic 23 231 16% 10.0%
White 161 815 58% 19.8%
Economically Disadvantaged 26 493 35% 5.3%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
AP/IB Results (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking 11th and Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups AP and/ 12th Group AP and/ Above AP and/ Above
or IB Graders Percent or IB Criterion or IB Criterion
All Students 77 570 100% 13.5% 57 77 74.0%
African American 0 108 19% 0.0% 0 0 -
Hispanic 6 86 15% 7.0% 3 6 50.0%
White 64 357 63% 17.9% 48 64 75.0%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 4
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: BRENHAM District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 239901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attendance Rate (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Total Days
Absent + Student
Student Groups Total Total Days Group Attendance
Days Present Present Percent Rate
All Students 715,940 745,061 100% 96.1%
African American 174,201 182,570 25% 95.4%
Hispanic 148,209 154,812 21% 95.7%
White 380,436 394,292 53% 96.5%
Economically Disadvantaged 333,248 349,223 47% 95.4%
Attendance Rate standard for your acknowledgment is 96.0%.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Scoring Number Percent Scoring
At or Above Taking Student At or Above
Student Groups Criteria on Both ELA Group Criteria on
Both ELA & Math & Math Percent Both ELA & Math
All Students 164 280 100% 59%
African American 10 43 15% 23%
Hispanic 20 35 13% 57%
White 127 192 69% 66%
Economically Disadvantaged 30 65 23% 46%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Reading/ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 967 2,906 100% 33%
African American 101 641 22% 16%
Hispanic 137 609 21% 22%
White 695 1,603 55% 43%
Economically Disadvantaged 284 1,375 47% 21%
Reading includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 5
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: BRENHAM District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 239901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 957 2,887 100% 33%
African American 81 640 22% 13%
Hispanic 130 607 21% 21%
White 711 1,586 55% 45%
Economically Disadvantaged 276 1,370 47% 20%
Mathematics includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Writing: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 216 606 100% 36%
African American 22 138 23% 16%
Hispanic 36 129 21% 28%
White 152 328 54% 46%
Economically Disadvantaged 66 301 50% 22%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Science: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 407 1,168 100% 35%
African American 25 235 20% 11%
Hispanic 46 208 18% 22%
White 327 706 60% 46%
Economically Disadvantaged 102 476 41% 21%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 6
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: BRENHAM District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 239901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Social Studies: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 405 869 100% 47%
African American 41 * 21% 23%
Hispanic 38 141 16% 27%
White 318 532 61% 60%
Economically Disadvantaged 84 323 37% 26%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/DAP (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Percent
Rec. Student Completing
Student Groups HS Pgm. Total Group Rec.
Graduates Graduates Percent HS Pgm.
All Students 241 343 100% 70.3%
African American 29 68 20% 42.6%
Hispanic 29 42 12% 69.0%
White 173 221 64% 78.3%
Economically Disadvantaged 49 95 28% 51.6%
The count of RHSP graduates includes Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) graduates.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 7
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: BRENHAM District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 239901
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
SAT/ACT Results (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking Non-Special Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups SAT and/ Education Group SAT and/ Above SAT and/ Above
or ACT Graduates Percent or ACT Criterion or ACT Criterion
All Students 143 302 100% 47.4% 54 143 37.8%
African American 16 50 17% 32.0% 0 16 0.0%
Hispanic 13 39 13% 33.3% 2 13 15.4%
White 109 201 67% 54.2% 47 109 43.1%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard ELA Percent Standard
All Students 174 275 100% 63%
African American 28 54 20% 52%
Hispanic 12 31 11% 39%
White 131 186 68% 70%
Economically Disadvantaged 39 84 31% 46%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Mathematics: ACKNOWLEDGED
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard Mathematics Percent Standard
All Students 219 267 100% 82%
African American 35 52 19% 67%
Hispanic 24 29 11% 83%
White 158 182 68% 87%
Economically Disadvantaged 56 81 30% 69%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation of Masking Rules
2010 Accountability Manual
2010 Accountability
Performance Reporting