November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 1
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LANEVILLE District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 201903
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS (TAKS) TABLE
Required Status
|------------- 2010 -------------||--------- 2009 ---------||----- Improvement -----||-------- 2010 TPM -------|----- by Measure -----|
Number Pct Stu Number Pct Met Number Pct
Performance Met Number Met Grp Met Number Met Min Act Met Met Std Number Met
Results Std Taking Std % Std Taking Std Size Chg RI RI? w/TPM Taking w/TPM STD RI TPM EXCP ***
Reading/ELA (70%/80%/90%)
All Students * * 86% 100% 56 66 85% 1 * * 99% RE RE EX - EX
African Amer * * 81% 77% 44 54 81% 0 * * 98% RE RE EX - EX
Hispanic * * > 99% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% - - - - -
White * * > 99% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Econ Disadv * * 83% 84% 42 49 86% -3 * * 98% RE RE EX - EX
Writing (70%/80%/90%)
All Students * * > 99% * * * 93% * * * > 99% EX - - - EX
African Amer * * > 99% * * * 92% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Hispanic * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
White * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Econ Disadv * * > 99% * * * 90% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Social Studies (70%/80%/90%)
All Students * * > 99% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% EX - - - EX
African Amer * * > 99% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Hispanic * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
White * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Econ Disadv * * > 99% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Mathematics (60%/80%/90%)
All Students 53 70 76% 100% 45 64 70% Yes 6 5 Yes 60 70 86% AA RE - - RE
African Amer 39 52 75% 74% 33 52 63% Yes 12 9 Yes 43 52 83% AA RE - - RE
Hispanic * * > 99% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% - - - - -
White * * 60% 14% * * > 99% * * * 90% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 44 59 75% 84% 34 49 69% Yes 6 6 Yes 49 59 83% AA RE - - RE
Science (55%/80%/90%)
All Students 17 29 59% 100% 13 25 52% Yes 7 ** No 20 29 69% AA - - - AA
African Amer 12 24 50% 83% 8 19 42% 8 15 24 63% - - - - -
Hispanic * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
White * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Econ Disadv 12 23 52% 79% 9 20 45% 7 14 23 61% - - - - -
** Met the minimum size requirement, but did not meet the 75% floor for Recognized.
*** Summary column: Note that RI, TPM, and EXCP may elevate the rating one level, but only one level.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXCEPTIONS TABLE
Number Msrs Number Number Floor(s) Msr(s) Used
Evaluated Allowed Needed Met? in 2009? Exceptions Applied
9 2 1 No N/A No
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 2
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LANEVILLE District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 201903
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
COMPLETION RATE I TABLE (Gr. 9-12) (75.0%/85.0%/95.0%)
Required
|----------- Class of 2009 ------------||--- Class of 2008 ----||------ Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# Com- # # in Comp Grp # Com- # in Comp Min Act Met
pleters Dropouts Class Rate % pleters Class Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 8 3 12 66.7% 100% 13 13 100.0% -33.3
African Amer 5 2 7 71.4% 58% 10 10 100.0% -28.6
Hispanic * * * * 8% 0 0 - *
White * * 4 * 33% * 3 * *
Econ Disadv 7 1 9 77.8% 75% 9 9 100.0% -22.2
Decreases in completion rates may be due to significant changes in the dropout definition
beginning with the 2005-06 school year.
Completion data not evaluated for your accountability rating due to small numbers or no data.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE TABLE (Gr. 7-8) (1.8%)
Required
|------------ 2008-09 -------------||--------- 2007-08 ---------||----- Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# # 7-8 Dropout Grp # # 7-8 Dropout Min Act Met
Dropouts Graders Rate % Dropouts Graders Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 0 24 0.0% 100% 0 17 0.0% 0.0
African Amer 0 15 0.0% 63% 0 10 0.0% 0.0
Hispanic * 4 * 17% * 4 * *
White * 4 * 17% * 3 * *
Econ Disadv 0 16 0.0% 67% 0 15 0.0% 0.0
Dropout data not evaluated for your accountability rating due to small numbers or no data.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 3
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LANEVILLE District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 201903
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Summary of Gold Performance Acknowledgments
Earned 2 acknowledgment(s) out of 13 evaluated.
Advanced Courses NQ Commended Reading/ELA NQ
AP/IB NQ Commended Mathematics NQ
Attendance Rate NQ Commended Writing NQ
College-Ready NQ Commended Science NQ
RHSP/DAP NQ Commended Social Studies ++
SAT/ACT NQ TSI ELA NQ
TSI Mathematics ++
++ = Acknowledged; NQ = Does Not Qualify; Blank = Not Applicable
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
w/Credit for w/Credit for Student w/Credit for
Student Groups an Advanced Any Group Advanced
Course Course Percent Courses
All Students 0 40 100% 0.0%
African American 0 30 75% 0.0%
Hispanic 0 5 13% 0.0%
White * 4 10% *
Economically Disadvantaged 0 33 83% 0.0%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
AP/IB Results (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking 11th and Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups AP and/ 12th Group AP and/ Above AP and/ Above
or IB Graders Percent or IB Criterion or IB Criterion
All Students 0 13 100% 0.0% 0 0 -
African American 0 10 77% 0.0% 0 0 -
Hispanic * 2 15% * * * *
White * * 8% * * * *
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 4
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LANEVILLE District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 201903
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attendance Rate (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Total Days
Absent + Student
Student Groups Total Total Days Group Attendance
Days Present Present Percent Rate
All Students 19,586 20,942 100% 93.5%
African American 14,843 15,871 76% 93.5%
Hispanic 2,278 2,414 12% 94.4%
White 2,311 2,492 12% 92.7%
Economically Disadvantaged 15,939 17,062 81% 93.4%
Attendance Rate standard for your acknowledgment is 96.0%.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Scoring Number Percent Scoring
At or Above Taking Student At or Above
Student Groups Criteria on Both ELA Group Criteria on
Both ELA & Math & Math Percent Both ELA & Math
All Students * * * *
African American * * * *
Hispanic * * * *
White - - - -
Economically Disadvantaged * * * *
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Reading/ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 7 * 100% 10%
African American 6 * 77% 11%
Hispanic * * * < 1%
White * * * 13%
Economically Disadvantaged 5 * 84% 9%
Reading includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 5
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LANEVILLE District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 201903
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 8 70 100% 11%
African American 5 52 74% 10%
Hispanic 3 * * 50%
White * * 14% < 1%
Economically Disadvantaged 7 59 84% 12%
Mathematics includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Writing: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students * * * 6%
African American * * * 8%
Hispanic * * * *
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged * * * 8%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Science: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 4 29 100% 14%
African American * 24 83% 4%
Hispanic * * * *
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged * 23 79% 4%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 6
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LANEVILLE District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 201903
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Social Studies: ACKNOWLEDGED
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 10 * * 45%
African American 7 * * 37%
Hispanic * * * *
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged 7 * * 41%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/DAP (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Percent
Rec. Student Completing
Student Groups HS Pgm. Total Group Rec.
Graduates Graduates Percent HS Pgm.
All Students 6 9 100% 66.7%
African American 3 5 56% 60.0%
Hispanic * * 11% *
White * 3 33% *
Economically Disadvantaged 5 8 89% 62.5%
The count of RHSP graduates includes Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) graduates.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 7
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: LANEVILLE District Rating: Academically Acceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 201903
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
SAT/ACT Results (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking Non-Special Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups SAT and/ Education Group SAT and/ Above SAT and/ Above
or ACT Graduates Percent or ACT Criterion or ACT Criterion
All Students 5 6 100% 83.3% 0 5 0.0%
African American * 3 50% * * * *
Hispanic * * 17% * * * *
White * 2 33% * * * *
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard ELA Percent Standard
All Students 5 8 100% 63%
African American * * * 71%
Hispanic * * * *
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged * * * 60%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Mathematics: ACKNOWLEDGED
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard Mathematics Percent Standard
All Students * * * 71%
African American * * * 67%
Hispanic * * * *
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged * * * *
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation of Masking Rules
2010 Accountability Manual
2010 Accountability
Performance Reporting