November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 1
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: NORTH FOREST District Rating: Academically Unacceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 101909
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
Reasons for Academically Unacceptable rating are highlighted in ORANGE.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS (TAKS) TABLE
Required Status
|------------- 2010 -------------||--------- 2009 ---------||----- Improvement -----||-------- 2010 TPM -------|----- by Measure -----|
Number Pct Stu Number Pct Met Number Pct
Performance Met Number Met Grp Met Number Met Min Act Met Met Std Number Met
Results Std Taking Std % Std Taking Std Size Chg RI RI? w/TPM Taking w/TPM STD RI TPM EXCP ***
Reading/ELA (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 2,799 3,509 80% 100% 2,813 3,852 73% 7 3,148 3,509 90% RE RE EX - EX
African Amer 1,802 2,287 79% 65% 1,869 2,583 72% Yes 7 4 Yes 2,039 2,287 89% AA RE - - RE
Hispanic 979 1,201 82% 34% 936 1,260 74% 8 1,090 1,201 91% RE RE EX - EX
White * * 93% * * * > 99% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 2,798 3,508 80% 100% 2,809 3,846 73% 7 3,147 3,508 90% RE RE EX - EX
Writing (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 733 838 87% 100% 800 947 84% 3 787 838 94% RE RE EX - EX
African Amer 470 535 88% 64% 518 629 82% 6 499 535 93% RE RE EX - EX
Hispanic 256 296 86% 35% 280 316 89% -3 281 296 95% RE RE EX - EX
White * * > 99% * * * * * * * > 99% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 733 838 87% 100% 797 944 84% 3 787 838 94% RE RE EX - EX
Social Studies (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 783 885 88% 100% 851 1,075 79% 9 857 885 97% RE RE EX - EX
African Amer 544 621 88% 70% 597 767 78% 10 599 621 96% RE RE EX - EX
Hispanic 235 260 90% 29% 252 306 82% 8 254 260 98% EX - - - EX
White * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Econ Disadv 781 883 88% 100% 850 1,074 79% 9 855 883 97% RE RE EX - EX
Mathematics (60%/80%/90%)
All Students 2,462 3,478 71% 100% 2,520 3,810 66% Yes 5 ** No 2,805 3,478 81% AA AA RE - RE
African Amer 1,545 2,265 68% 65% 1,612 2,570 63% Yes 5 ** No 1,799 2,265 79% AA - - - AA
Hispanic 901 1,190 76% 34% 903 1,232 73% Yes 3 4 No 988 1,190 83% AA AA RE - RE
White 12 16 75% 0% * * 60% 15 13 16 81% - - - - -
Econ Disadv 2,460 3,476 71% 100% 2,515 3,804 66% Yes 5 ** No 2,803 3,476 81% AA AA RE - RE
Science (55%/80%/90%)
All Students 1,026 1,320 78% 100% 905 1,523 59% Yes 19 11 Yes 1,144 1,320 87% AA RE - - RE
African Amer 668 890 75% 67% 605 1,073 56% Yes 19 12 Yes 755 890 85% AA RE - - RE
Hispanic 352 424 83% 32% 299 447 67% 16 383 424 90% RE RE EX - EX
White * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Econ Disadv 1,024 1,318 78% 100% 904 1,522 59% Yes 19 11 Yes 1,142 1,318 87% AA RE - - RE
** Met the minimum size requirement, but did not meet the 75% floor for Recognized.
*** Summary column: Note that RI, TPM, and EXCP may elevate the rating one level, but only one level.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXCEPTIONS TABLE
Number Msrs Number Number Floor(s) Msr(s) Used
Evaluated Allowed Needed Met? in 2009? Exceptions Applied
20 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 2
2010 DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: NORTH FOREST District Rating: Academically Unacceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 101909
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
Reasons for Academically Unacceptable rating are highlighted in ORANGE.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
COMPLETION RATE I TABLE (Gr. 9-12) (75.0%/85.0%/95.0%)
Required
|----------- Class of 2009 ------------||--- Class of 2008 ----||------ Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# Com- # # in Comp Grp # Com- # in Comp Min Act Met
pleters Dropouts Class Rate % pleters Class Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 261 232 501 52.1% 100% 259 522 49.6% Yes 2.5 12.7 No
African Amer 214 176 397 53.9% 79% 215 421 51.1% Yes 2.8 12.0 No
Hispanic 44 54 99 44.4% 20% 44 100 44.0% Yes 0.4 15.5 No
White * * 4 * 1% * * * *
Econ Disadv 243 194 443 54.9% 88% 257 489 52.6% Yes 2.3 11.2 No
Decreases in completion rates may be due to significant changes in the dropout definition
beginning with the 2005-06 school year.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE TABLE (Gr. 7-8) (1.8%)
Required
|------------ 2008-09 -------------||--------- 2007-08 ---------||----- Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# # 7-8 Dropout Grp # # 7-8 Dropout Min Act Met
Dropouts Graders Rate % Dropouts Graders Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 6 1,284 0.5% 100% 7 1,338 0.5% 0.0
African Amer 4 871 0.5% 68% 7 927 0.8% -0.3
Hispanic 2 401 0.5% 31% 0 403 0.0% 0.5
White 0 10 0.0% 1% 0 6 0.0% 0.0
Econ Disadv 5 1,097 0.5% 85% 4 1,246 0.3% 0.2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 3
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: NORTH FOREST District Rating: Academically Unacceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 101909
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Summary of Gold Performance Acknowledgments
Earned 0 acknowledgment(s) out of 13 evaluated.
Advanced Courses NQ Commended Reading/ELA NQ
AP/IB NQ Commended Mathematics NQ
Attendance Rate NQ Commended Writing NQ
College-Ready NQ Commended Science NQ
RHSP/DAP NQ Commended Social Studies NQ
SAT/ACT NQ TSI ELA NQ
TSI Mathematics NQ
++ = Acknowledged; NQ = Does Not Qualify; Blank = Not Applicable
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
w/Credit for w/Credit for Student w/Credit for
Student Groups an Advanced Any Group Advanced
Course Course Percent Courses
All Students 465 1,863 100% 25.0%
African American 368 1,410 76% 26.1%
Hispanic 96 446 24% 21.5%
White 0 5 0% 0.0%
Economically Disadvantaged 447 1,720 92% 26.0%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
AP/IB Results (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking 11th and Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups AP and/ 12th Group AP and/ Above AP and/ Above
or IB Graders Percent or IB Criterion or IB Criterion
All Students 90 649 100% 13.9% 1 90 1.1%
African American 69 521 80% 13.2% 0 69 0.0%
Hispanic 20 125 19% 16.0% 0 20 0.0%
White * * 0% * * * *
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 4
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: NORTH FOREST District Rating: Academically Unacceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 101909
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attendance Rate (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Total Days
Absent + Student
Student Groups Total Total Days Group Attendance
Days Present Present Percent Rate
All Students 975,021 1,029,019 100% 94.8%
African American 667,890 706,213 69% 94.6%
Hispanic 301,675 316,884 31% 95.2%
White 4,722 5,119 0% 92.2%
Economically Disadvantaged 950,657 1,002,545 97% 94.8%
Attendance Rate standard for your acknowledgment is 96.0%.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Scoring Number Percent Scoring
At or Above Taking Student At or Above
Student Groups Criteria on Both ELA Group Criteria on
Both ELA & Math & Math Percent Both ELA & Math
All Students 28 185 100% 15%
African American 16 148 80% 11%
Hispanic 11 35 19% 31%
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged 28 183 99% 15%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Reading/ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 569 3,509 100% 16%
African American 327 2,287 65% 14%
Hispanic 236 1,201 34% 20%
White 4 * * 27%
Economically Disadvantaged 569 3,508 100% 16%
Reading includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 5
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: NORTH FOREST District Rating: Academically Unacceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 101909
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 548 3,478 100% 16%
African American 291 2,265 65% 13%
Hispanic 251 1,190 34% 21%
White 4 16 0% 25%
Economically Disadvantaged 548 3,476 100% 16%
Mathematics includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same district.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Writing: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 150 838 100% 18%
African American 81 535 64% 15%
Hispanic 68 296 35% 23%
White * * * 14%
Economically Disadvantaged 150 838 100% 18%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Science: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 261 1,320 100% 20%
African American 140 890 67% 16%
Hispanic 119 424 32% 28%
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged 260 1,318 100% 20%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 6
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: NORTH FOREST District Rating: Academically Unacceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 101909
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Social Studies: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 202 885 100% 23%
African American 125 621 70% 20%
Hispanic 74 260 29% 28%
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged 200 883 100% 23%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/DAP (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Percent
Rec. Student Completing
Student Groups HS Pgm. Total Group Rec.
Graduates Graduates Percent HS Pgm.
All Students 181 222 100% 81.5%
African American 143 182 82% 78.6%
Hispanic 37 38 17% 97.4%
White * * 0% *
Economically Disadvantaged 180 219 99% 82.2%
The count of RHSP graduates includes Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) graduates.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 7
2010 DISTRICT GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: NORTH FOREST District Rating: Academically Unacceptable
DISTRICT NUMBER: 101909
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
SAT/ACT Results (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking Non-Special Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups SAT and/ Education Group SAT and/ Above SAT and/ Above
or ACT Graduates Percent or ACT Criterion or ACT Criterion
All Students 142 189 100% 75.1% 2 142 1.4%
African American 123 150 79% 82.0% 1 123 0.8%
Hispanic 19 37 20% 51.4% 1 19 5.3%
White * * 1% * * * *
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard ELA Percent Standard
All Students 74 267 100% 28%
African American 56 202 76% 28%
Hispanic 18 64 24% 28%
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged 74 267 100% 28%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard Mathematics Percent Standard
All Students 128 260 100% 49%
African American 92 196 75% 47%
Hispanic 35 63 24% 56%
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged 127 259 100% 49%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation of Masking Rules
2010 Accountability Manual
2010 Accountability
Performance Reporting