November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 1
2010 CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: COMMUNITY
CAMPUS NAME: COMMUNITY H S Campus Rating: Recognized
CAMPUS NUMBER: 043918001 Grade Span: 09 - 12
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS (TAKS) TABLE
Required Status
|------------- 2010 -------------||--------- 2009 ---------||----- Improvement -----||-------- 2010 TPM -------|----- by Measure -----|
Number Pct Stu Number Pct Met Number Pct
Performance Met Number Met Grp Met Number Met Min Act Met Met Std Number Met
Results Std Taking Std % Std Taking Std Size Chg RI RI? w/TPM Taking w/TPM STD RI TPM EXCP ***
Reading/ELA (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 282 303 93% 100% 287 320 90% 3 295 303 97% EX - - - EX
African Amer * * > 99% * * * 92% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Hispanic 50 56 89% 18% 44 50 88% 1 53 56 95% RE RE EX - EX
White 221 235 94% 78% 228 254 90% 4 231 235 98% EX - - - EX
Econ Disadv 80 89 90% 29% 61 76 80% 10 85 89 96% EX - - - EX
Writing (70%/80%/90%)
All Students * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
African Amer * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Hispanic * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
White * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Econ Disadv * * * * * * * * * * * - - - - -
Social Studies (70%/80%/90%)
All Students 170 186 91% 100% 200 213 94% -3 179 186 96% EX - - - EX
African Amer * * * * * * > 99% * * * * - - - - -
Hispanic * * 92% 20% * * 92% 0 * * > 99% EX - - - EX
White 132 143 92% 77% 165 176 94% -2 137 143 96% EX - - - EX
Econ Disadv 51 57 89% 31% * * 98% -9 54 57 95% RE RE EX - EX
Mathematics (60%/80%/90%)
All Students 230 297 77% 100% 211 308 69% Yes 8 6 Yes 266 297 90% AA RE - - RE
African Amer * * > 99% * 7 12 58% * * * > 99% - - - - -
Hispanic 37 55 67% 19% 28 47 60% Yes 7 ** No 45 55 82% AA AA RE - RE
White 183 231 79% 78% 175 246 71% Yes 8 5 Yes 211 231 91% AA RE - - RE
Econ Disadv 59 83 71% 28% 40 70 57% Yes 14 ** No 71 83 86% AA AA RE - RE
Science (55%/80%/90%)
All Students 144 176 82% 100% 161 212 76% 6 157 176 89% RE - - - RE
African Amer * * * * 7 10 70% * * * * - - - - -
Hispanic 26 36 72% 20% 12 24 50% Yes 22 ** No 29 36 81% AA AA RE - RE
White 114 135 84% 77% 140 175 80% 4 124 135 92% RE RE EX - EX
Econ Disadv 42 51 82% 29% 35 47 74% 8 45 51 88% RE - - - RE
** Met the minimum size requirement, but did not meet the 75% floor for Recognized.
*** Summary column: Note that RI, TPM, and EXCP may elevate the rating one level, but only one level.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXCEPTIONS TABLE
Number Msrs Number Number Floor(s) Msr(s) Used
Evaluated Allowed Needed Met? in 2009? Exceptions Applied
16 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 2
2010 CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: COMMUNITY
CAMPUS NAME: COMMUNITY H S Campus Rating: Recognized
CAMPUS NUMBER: 043918001 Grade Span: 09 - 12
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Accountability standards are shown in parentheses.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
COMPLETION RATE I TABLE (Gr. 9-12) (75.0%/85.0%/95.0%)
Required
|----------- Class of 2009 ------------||--- Class of 2008 ----||------ Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# Com- # # in Comp Grp # Com- # in Comp Min Act Met
pleters Dropouts Class Rate % pleters Class Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 112 7 123 91.1% 100% 103 114 90.4% 0.7
African Amer 7 0 7 100.0% 6% * 2 * *
Hispanic 23 1 24 95.8% 20% 15 19 78.9% 16.9
White 80 6 90 88.9% 73% 83 90 92.2% -3.3
Econ Disadv 25 4 29 86.2% 24% 20 24 83.3% 2.9
Decreases in completion rates may be due to significant changes in the dropout definition
beginning with the 2005-06 school year.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE TABLE (Gr. 7-8) (1.8%)
Required
|------------ 2008-09 -------------||--------- 2007-08 ---------||----- Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# # 7-8 Dropout Grp # # 7-8 Dropout Min Act Met
Dropouts Graders Rate % Dropouts Graders Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students - - - - - - - -
African Amer - - - - - - - -
Hispanic - - - - - - - -
White - - - - - - - -
Econ Disadv - - - - - - - -
Dropout data not evaluated for your accountability rating due to grade span, small numbers, or no data.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 3
2010 CAMPUS GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: COMMUNITY
CAMPUS NAME: COMMUNITY H S Campus Rating: Recognized
CAMPUS NUMBER: 043918001 Grade Span: 09 - 12
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Summary of Gold Performance Acknowledgments
Earned 0 acknowledgment(s) out of 12 evaluated.
Advanced Courses NQ Commended Reading/ELA NQ
AP/IB NQ Commended Mathematics NQ
Attendance Rate NQ Commended Writing
College-Ready NQ Commended Science NQ
RHSP/DAP NQ Commended Social Studies NQ
SAT/ACT NQ TSI ELA NQ
CI: Reading TSI Mathematics NQ
CI: Mathematics
++ = Acknowledged; NQ = Does Not Qualify; Blank = Not Applicable
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
w/Credit for w/Credit for Student w/Credit for
Student Groups an Advanced Any Group Advanced
Course Course Percent Courses
All Students 85 484 100% 17.6%
African American 2 21 4% 9.5%
Hispanic 17 86 18% 19.8%
White 65 372 77% 17.5%
Economically Disadvantaged 17 117 24% 14.5%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
AP/IB Results (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking 11th and Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups AP and/ 12th Group AP and/ Above AP and/ Above
or IB Graders Percent or IB Criterion or IB Criterion
All Students 21 204 100% 10.3% 1 21 4.8%
African American * 9 4% 11.1% * * *
Hispanic 4 33 16% 12.1% * 4 *
White 15 159 78% 9.4% 1 15 6.7%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 4
2010 CAMPUS GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: COMMUNITY
CAMPUS NAME: COMMUNITY H S Campus Rating: Recognized
CAMPUS NUMBER: 043918001 Grade Span: 09 - 12
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attendance Rate (2008-09): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Total Days
Absent + Student
Student Groups Total Total Days Group Attendance
Days Present Present Percent Rate
All Students 79,391 82,999 100% 95.7%
African American 3,439 3,560 4% 96.6%
Hispanic 13,679 14,240 17% 96.1%
White 61,530 64,440 78% 95.5%
Economically Disadvantaged 19,835 20,905 25% 94.9%
Attendance Rate standard for your acknowledgment is 95.0%.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Scoring Number Percent Scoring
At or Above Taking Student At or Above
Student Groups Criteria on Both ELA Group Criteria on
Both ELA & Math & Math Percent Both ELA & Math
All Students 32 95 100% 34%
African American * * * < 1%
Hispanic 6 21 22% 29%
White 25 66 69% 38%
Economically Disadvantaged 8 24 25% 33%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Reading/ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 54 303 100% 18%
African American * * * 17%
Hispanic 10 56 18% 18%
White 41 235 78% 17%
Economically Disadvantaged 13 89 29% 15%
Reading includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same campus.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 5
2010 CAMPUS GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: COMMUNITY
CAMPUS NAME: COMMUNITY H S Campus Rating: Recognized
CAMPUS NUMBER: 043918001 Grade Span: 09 - 12
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 66 297 100% 22%
African American * * * 40%
Hispanic 15 55 19% 27%
White 47 231 78% 20%
Economically Disadvantaged 16 83 28% 19%
Mathematics includes second administration results for Student Success Initiative students
tested at the same campus.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Writing: NOT APPLICABLE
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students * * * *
African American * * * *
Hispanic * * * *
White * * * *
Economically Disadvantaged * * * *
Writing data not evaluated for your acknowledgment due to grade span, small numbers,
or no data.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Science: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 23 176 100% 13%
African American * * * *
Hispanic * 36 20% 6%
White 20 135 77% 15%
Economically Disadvantaged 6 51 29% 12%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 6
2010 CAMPUS GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: COMMUNITY
CAMPUS NAME: COMMUNITY H S Campus Rating: Recognized
CAMPUS NUMBER: 043918001 Grade Span: 09 - 12
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Commended on Social Studies: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Student
Student Groups Number Number Group Percent
Commended Taking Percent Commended
All Students 63 186 100% 34%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 10 * 20% 27%
White 52 143 77% 36%
Economically Disadvantaged 19 57 31% 33%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comparable Improvement: NOT APPLICABLE
Total Number of
Matched Students Quartile
Reading - ^
Mathematics - ^
Data not evaluated for CI acknowledgment due to no matched students or small numbers.
^ Does Not Meet Minimum Size Requirement.
There is no CI Report for Your Campus.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/DAP (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Percent
Rec. Student Completing
Student Groups HS Pgm. Total Group Rec.
Graduates Graduates Percent HS Pgm.
All Students 79 103 100% 76.7%
African American 5 7 7% 71.4%
Hispanic 18 22 21% 81.8%
White 55 73 71% 75.3%
Economically Disadvantaged 21 26 25% 80.8%
The count of RHSP graduates includes Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) graduates.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
November 2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 7
2010 CAMPUS GOLD PERFORMANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT (GPA) DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: COMMUNITY
CAMPUS NAME: COMMUNITY H S Campus Rating: Recognized
CAMPUS NUMBER: 043918001 Grade Span: 09 - 12
Analysis groups used to determine acknowledgment are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*') are used to protect student confidentiality.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
SAT/ACT Results (Class of 2009): DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Percent
Number Number of Percent Scoring Number Scoring
Taking Non-Special Student Taking At or Taking At or
Student Groups SAT and/ Education Group SAT and/ Above SAT and/ Above
or ACT Graduates Percent or ACT Criterion or ACT Criterion
All Students 44 92 100% 47.8% 10 44 22.7%
African American * 5 5% 20.0% * * *
Hispanic 9 20 22% 45.0% 0 9 0.0%
White 31 66 72% 47.0% 8 31 25.8%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) ELA: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard ELA Percent Standard
All Students 43 83 100% 52%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 7 14 17% 50%
White 34 66 80% 52%
Economically Disadvantaged 12 23 28% 52%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Mathematics: DOES NOT QUALIFY
Number Number Percent
Scoring At Taking Student Scoring At
Student Groups or Above Exit-level Group or Above
Standard Mathematics Percent Standard
All Students 42 83 100% 51%
African American * * * *
Hispanic 4 14 17% 29%
White 36 66 80% 55%
Economically Disadvantaged 11 23 28% 48%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Explanation of Masking Rules
2010 Accountability Manual
2010 Accountability
Performance Reporting