Campus Ratings by School Type
| A |
68 |
21.6% |
37 |
21.5% |
13 |
19.1% |
15 |
23.8% |
3 |
25.0% |
| B |
115 |
36.5% |
65 |
37.8% |
20 |
29.4% |
25 |
39.7% |
5 |
41.7% |
| C |
78 |
24.8% |
43 |
25.0% |
15 |
22.1% |
17 |
27.0% |
3 |
25.0% |
| D |
43 |
13.7% |
19 |
11.0% |
17 |
25.0% |
6 |
9.5% |
1 |
8.3% |
| F |
11 |
3.5% |
8 |
4.7% |
3 |
4.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
315 |
100.0% |
172 |
100.0% |
68 |
100.0% |
63 |
100.0% |
12 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
14 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
9 |
|
5 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
14 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
9 |
|
5 |
|
| Totals |
329 |
|
172 |
|
68 |
|
72 |
|
17 |
|
Traditional and Charter Campus Ratings
| A |
68 |
21.6% |
68 |
22.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
| B |
115 |
36.5% |
111 |
36.0% |
4 |
57.1% |
| C |
78 |
24.8% |
75 |
24.4% |
3 |
42.9% |
| D |
43 |
13.7% |
43 |
14.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
11 |
3.5% |
11 |
3.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
315 |
100.0% |
308 |
100.0% |
7 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
14 |
|
13 |
|
1 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
14 |
|
13 |
|
1 |
|
| Totals |
329 |
|
321 |
|
8 |
|
Overall Campus Rating by Domain
| A |
54 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
43 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
51 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
68 |
| B |
8 |
57 |
44 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
89 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
57 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
115 |
| C |
0 |
5 |
54 |
12 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
18 |
49 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
51 |
19 |
0 |
6 |
78 |
| D |
0 |
0 |
9 |
21 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
29 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
25 |
9 |
1 |
43 |
| F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
11 |
| Not Rated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Totals |
62 |
72 |
110 |
37 |
24 |
24 |
51 |
131 |
76 |
33 |
12 |
26 |
70 |
75 |
94 |
50 |
13 |
27 |
329 |
Traditional and Charter District Ratings
| A |
7 |
11.9% |
7 |
12.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
| B |
23 |
39.0% |
21 |
38.2% |
2 |
50.0% |
| C |
18 |
30.5% |
16 |
29.1% |
2 |
50.0% |
| D |
11 |
18.6% |
11 |
20.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
59 |
100.0% |
55 |
100.0% |
4 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
1 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
1 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
| Totals |
60 |
|
55 |
|
5 |
|
Overall District Rating by Domain
| A |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
| B |
1 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| C |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
| D |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
| F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Not Rated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Totals |
7 |
17 |
26 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
21 |
23 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
22 |
18 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
Alternative Education Accountability Ratings by Campus Type
| A |
1 |
20.0% |
1 |
20.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| B |
2 |
40.0% |
2 |
40.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| C |
2 |
40.0% |
2 |
40.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| D |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
5 |
100.0% |
5 |
100.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Rated |
4 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
4 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
| Totals |
9 |
|
6 |
|
3 |
|
*Campuses identified as both a Residential Treatment Facility (RTF)
and a Dropout Recovery School (DRS) are counted as an RTF. |
Campus Ratings by Poverty Level
| A |
68 |
21.6% |
2 |
3.3% |
52 |
21.9% |
14 |
82.4% |
| B |
115 |
36.5% |
21 |
34.4% |
92 |
38.8% |
2 |
11.8% |
| C |
78 |
24.8% |
19 |
31.1% |
58 |
24.5% |
1 |
5.9% |
| D |
43 |
13.7% |
12 |
19.7% |
31 |
13.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
11 |
3.5% |
7 |
11.5% |
4 |
1.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
315 |
100.0% |
61 |
100.0% |
237 |
100.0% |
17 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
14 |
|
9 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
14 |
|
9 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
| Totals |
329 |
|
70 |
|
240 |
|
19 |
|
District Ratings by Poverty Level
| A |
7 |
11.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
7 |
13.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
| B |
23 |
39.0% |
1 |
14.3% |
22 |
43.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
| C |
18 |
30.5% |
2 |
28.6% |
15 |
29.4% |
1 |
100.0% |
| D |
11 |
18.6% |
4 |
57.1% |
7 |
13.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
59 |
100.0% |
7 |
100.0% |
51 |
100.0% |
1 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
1 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
1 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Totals |
60 |
|
8 |
|
51 |
|
1 |
|
Campus Distinction Designations
| Earned |
158 |
52.7% |
| Not Earned |
142 |
47.3% |
| Total Evaluated |
300 |
100.0% |
| Not Eligible |
29 |
|
| Total Not Eligible |
29 |
|
| Totals |
329 |
|
| 7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.7% |
| 6 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
2.0% |
| 5 |
5 |
11 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
7.9% |
| 4 |
11 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
6.9% |
| 3 |
12 |
4 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
9.9% |
| 2 |
12 |
7 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
11.8% |
| 1 |
13 |
15 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
12.8% |
| 0 |
57 |
52 |
22 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
146 |
48.0% |
| Totals |
115 |
98 |
74 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
304 |
100.0% |
Identification of Schools for Improvement
| Campus is not identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement, Targeted Support and Improvement, or Additional Targeted Support. |
260 |
79.0% |
| Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2025. |
8 |
2.4% |
| Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2024 and Comprehensive Progress in 2025. |
9 |
2.7% |
| Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2024 and 2025. |
1 |
0.3% |
| Campuses identified for Targeted Support and Improvement in 2025. |
33 |
10.0% |
| Campuses identified for Additional Targeted Support in 2025. |
14 |
4.3% |
| Campuses identified for Additional Targeted Support in 2024 and 2025. |
4 |
1.2% |
| Totals |
329 |
100.0% |