Texas Education Agency  
2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Summary
SHERMAN H S (091906002) - SHERMAN ISD - GRAYSON COUNTY

Group State District Campus Ever Enrolled
In College
Ever Enrolled,
No Certification
or Degree
Never Found
in College
Level 1
Certificate
Earned
Level 2
Certificate
Earned
Industry-based
Certification
Earned
Graduated with
2 Year Degree
Graduated with
4 Year Degree
Class of 2017
Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 46.9% 44.8% 67.9% 37.0% 32.1% ** 0.0% 0.0% 16.1% 11.1%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 53.1% 55.2% 83.0% 38.0% 17.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 12.0% 31.5%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.2% 37.6% 23.8% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 13.8% 22.4%
Class of 2016
Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 54.3% 52.0% 68.9% 39.4% 31.1% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 15.6% 11.1%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 45.7% 48.0% 82.5% 36.1% 17.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.6% 36.8%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.4% 37.9% 24.6% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 12.7% 23.4%
Class of 2015
Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 51.5% 47.5% 70.4% 40.7% 29.6% * 0.0% 0.0% 17.3% 11.1%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 48.5% 52.5% 85.5% 34.1% 14.5% * 0.0% 0.0% 12.9% 36.9%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.3% 37.2% 21.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 15.0% 24.6%
Class of 2014
Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 49.6% 44.9% 71.7% 43.5% 28.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 14.5% 13.1%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 50.4% 55.1% 80.3% 36.0% 19.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.6% 34.8%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.5% 39.3% 23.5% * 0.0% 0.0% 11.8% 25.1%
Class of 2013
Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 52.4% 49.5% 70.3% 43.9% 29.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.8% 14.2%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 47.6% 50.5% 85.4% 41.7% 14.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.3% 34.4%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 77.9% 42.8% 21.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.0% 24.4%
Class of 2012
Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 43.6% 39.5% 63.7% 47.6% 36.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1% 8.1%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 56.4% 60.5% 81.6% 36.3% 18.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 37.9%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 74.5% 40.8% 25.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.6% 26.1%
Class of 2011
Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 47.9% 44.1% 62.5% 46.1% 37.5% * 0.0% 0.0% 7.0% 8.6%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 52.1% 55.9% 85.8% 38.3% 14.2% * * 0.0% 6.2% 38.9%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.5% 41.7% 24.5% * * 0.0% 6.6% 25.5%
Class of 2010
Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 41.9% 38.7% 59.2% 44.2% 40.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% 8.3%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 58.1% 61.3% 77.9% 34.2% 21.6% * * 0.0% 9.5% 32.1%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.7% 38.1% 29.0% * * 0.0% 8.1% 22.9%
Class of 2009
Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 29.9% 27.6% 63.9% 37.4% 36.1% * 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 10.8%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 70.1% 72.4% 80.7% 39.5% 18.8% ** * 0.0% 6.0% 32.6%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.1% 38.9% 23.6% 2.7% * 0.0% 8.0% 26.6%
Class of 2008
Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 26.8% 22.6% 63.1% 44.6% 36.9% 0.0% * 0.0% 9.2% 7.7%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 73.2% 77.4% 80.6% 42.8% 19.4% * 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 31.5%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.7% 43.2% 23.3% * * 0.0% 5.9% 26.1%

  Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC).
- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size)
n/a Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

      TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting