2023 Accountability Reports
Campus Ratings by School Type
| A |
42 |
13.4% |
18 |
10.6% |
12 |
17.6% |
10 |
15.4% |
2 |
20.0% |
| B |
111 |
35.5% |
57 |
33.5% |
28 |
41.2% |
20 |
30.8% |
6 |
60.0% |
| C |
91 |
29.1% |
48 |
28.2% |
15 |
22.1% |
27 |
41.5% |
1 |
10.0% |
| D |
50 |
16.0% |
33 |
19.4% |
9 |
13.2% |
7 |
10.8% |
1 |
10.0% |
| F |
19 |
6.1% |
14 |
8.2% |
4 |
5.9% |
1 |
1.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
313 |
100.0% |
170 |
100.0% |
68 |
100.0% |
65 |
100.0% |
10 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
13 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
13 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
| Totals |
326 |
|
170 |
|
69 |
|
72 |
|
15 |
|
Traditional and Charter Campus Ratings
| A |
42 |
13.4% |
41 |
13.4% |
1 |
12.5% |
| B |
111 |
35.5% |
108 |
35.4% |
3 |
37.5% |
| C |
91 |
29.1% |
89 |
29.2% |
2 |
25.0% |
| D |
50 |
16.0% |
50 |
16.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
19 |
6.1% |
17 |
5.6% |
2 |
25.0% |
| A - F Totals |
313 |
100.0% |
305 |
100.0% |
8 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
13 |
|
12 |
|
1 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
13 |
|
12 |
|
1 |
|
| Totals |
326 |
|
317 |
|
9 |
|
Overall Campus Rating by Domain
| A |
33 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
42 |
| B |
18 |
53 |
32 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
89 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
38 |
55 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
111 |
| C |
0 |
7 |
78 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
27 |
56 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
43 |
36 |
4 |
5 |
91 |
| D |
0 |
0 |
11 |
32 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
22 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
29 |
16 |
4 |
50 |
| F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
2 |
19 |
| Not Rated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
13 |
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Totals |
51 |
69 |
121 |
40 |
21 |
24 |
28 |
135 |
92 |
28 |
18 |
25 |
47 |
47 |
99 |
74 |
31 |
28 |
326 |
Traditional and Charter District Ratings
| A |
3 |
5.1% |
2 |
3.6% |
1 |
25.0% |
| B |
23 |
39.0% |
22 |
40.0% |
1 |
25.0% |
| C |
20 |
33.9% |
20 |
36.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
| D |
11 |
18.6% |
10 |
18.2% |
1 |
25.0% |
| F |
2 |
3.4% |
1 |
1.8% |
1 |
25.0% |
| A - F Totals |
59 |
100.0% |
55 |
100.0% |
4 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
1 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
1 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
| Totals |
60 |
|
55 |
|
5 |
|
Overall District Rating by Domain
| A |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| B |
1 |
19 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| C |
0 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
| D |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
11 |
| F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
| Not Rated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Totals |
3 |
21 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
22 |
24 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
22 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
60 |
Alternative Education Accountability Ratings by Campus Type
| A |
1 |
16.7% |
1 |
16.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
| B |
2 |
33.3% |
2 |
33.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
| C |
3 |
50.0% |
3 |
50.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| D |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| A - F Totals |
6 |
100.0% |
6 |
100.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
| Not Rated |
3 |
|
0 |
|
3 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
3 |
|
0 |
|
3 |
|
| Totals |
9 |
|
6 |
|
3 |
|
*Campuses identified as both a Residential Treatment Facility (RTF)
and a Dropout Recovery School (DRS) are counted as an RTF. |
Campus Ratings by Poverty Level
| A |
42 |
13.4% |
1 |
1.6% |
30 |
12.8% |
11 |
68.8% |
| B |
111 |
35.5% |
17 |
27.0% |
90 |
38.5% |
4 |
25.0% |
| C |
91 |
29.1% |
18 |
28.6% |
73 |
31.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
| D |
50 |
16.0% |
20 |
31.7% |
30 |
12.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
19 |
6.1% |
7 |
11.1% |
11 |
4.7% |
1 |
6.3% |
| A - F Totals |
313 |
100.0% |
63 |
100.0% |
234 |
100.0% |
16 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
13 |
|
5 |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
13 |
|
5 |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
| Totals |
326 |
|
68 |
|
241 |
|
17 |
|
District Ratings by Poverty Level
| A |
3 |
5.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
3 |
6.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
| B |
23 |
39.0% |
2 |
22.2% |
21 |
42.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
| C |
20 |
33.9% |
2 |
22.2% |
18 |
36.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
| D |
11 |
18.6% |
5 |
55.6% |
6 |
12.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
| F |
2 |
3.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
1 |
2.0% |
1 |
100.0% |
| A - F Totals |
59 |
100.0% |
9 |
100.0% |
49 |
100.0% |
1 |
100.0% |
| Not Rated |
1 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Not Rated: Data Under Review |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Other Totals |
1 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| Totals |
60 |
|
10 |
|
49 |
|
1 |
|
Campus Distinction Designations
| Earned |
155 |
52.4% |
| Not Earned |
141 |
47.6% |
| Total Evaluated |
296 |
100.0% |
| Not Eligible |
30 |
|
| Total Not Eligible |
30 |
|
| Totals |
326 |
|
| 7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.7% |
| 6 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1.7% |
| 5 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.4% |
| 4 |
12 |
8 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
8.8% |
| 3 |
8 |
8 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
8.8% |
| 2 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
11.9% |
| 1 |
16 |
18 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
16.3% |
| 0 |
52 |
42 |
29 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
139 |
47.3% |
| Totals |
114 |
89 |
73 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
294 |
100.0% |
Identification of Schools for Improvement
| Campus is not identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement, Targeted Support and Improvement, or Additional Targeted Support. |
262 |
80.4% |
| Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2023. |
11 |
3.4% |
| Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2022 and Comprehensive Progress in 2023. |
7 |
2.1% |
| Campuses identified for Targeted Support and Improvement in 2023. |
24 |
7.4% |
| Campuses identified for Additional Targeted Support in 2023. |
22 |
6.7% |
| Totals |
326 |
100.0% |