| Texas Education Agency | |||
| 2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Yearly Details | |||
| TCCSE EARLY COLLEGE H S AT TIMBERVIEW (220908009) - MANSFIELD ISD - TARRANT COUNTY | |||
| Years Out From Graduation |
Group | State | District | Campus | Enrolled In College |
Continued College Enrollment |
Not Found in College |
Level 1 Certificate Earned |
Level 2 Certificate Earned |
Industry-based Certification Earned |
Graduated with 2 Year Degree |
Graduated with 4 Year Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class of 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 53.5% | 40.3% | 41.2% | 81.0% | - | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 95.2% | 0.0% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 46.5% | 59.7% | 58.8% | 96.7% | - | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.0% | 0.0% | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 90.2% | - | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 92.2% | 0.0% | |
| Class of 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 36.3% | 52.6% | 90.0% | - | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 70.0% | 0.0% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 63.7% | 47.4% | 97.2% | - | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 69.4% | 0.0% | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 93.4% | - | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 69.7% | 0.0% | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 36.3% | 52.6% | 85.0% | 82.5% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 63.7% | 47.4% | 88.9% | 88.9% | * | * | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.9% | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 86.8% | 85.5% | * | * | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.6% | |
| Class of 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.5% | 33.7% | 36.4% | 85.0% | - | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.5% | 66.3% | 63.6% | 88.6% | - | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 74.3% | 0.0% | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 87.3% | - | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 69.1% | 0.0% | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.5% | 33.7% | 36.4% | 80.0% | 80.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 0.0% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.5% | 66.3% | 63.6% | 82.9% | 82.9% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 81.8% | 81.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.5% | 33.7% | 36.4% | 70.0% | 65.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.5% | 66.3% | 63.6% | 82.9% | 80.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | ** | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 78.2% | 74.6% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 18.2% | |
| Class of 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 50.6% | 35.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 49.4% | 64.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 35.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 64.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 35.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 64.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 35.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 64.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 35.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 64.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 35.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 64.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 48.0% | 35.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.0% | 64.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 32.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 67.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 32.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 67.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 32.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 67.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 32.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 67.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 32.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 67.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 32.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 67.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2016 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2015 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 28.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 71.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2014 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 29.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 70.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 29.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 70.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 29.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 70.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 29.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 70.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 29.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 70.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 29.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 70.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2013 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 29.7% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 70.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 29.7% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 70.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 29.7% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 70.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 29.7% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 70.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 29.7% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 70.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 29.7% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 70.3% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2012 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 26.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 73.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 26.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 73.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 26.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 73.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 26.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 73.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 26.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 73.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 26.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 73.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2011 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 27.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 72.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 27.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 72.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 27.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 72.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 27.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 72.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 27.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 72.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 27.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 72.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2010 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 23.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 76.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 23.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 76.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 23.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 76.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 23.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 76.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 23.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 76.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 23.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 76.5% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2009 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 17.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 82.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 17.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 82.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 17.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 82.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 17.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 82.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 17.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 82.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 17.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 82.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Class of 2008 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 16.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 83.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 16.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 83.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 16.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 83.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 4 | Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 16.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 83.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 16.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 83.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 16.1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 83.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC). | |
| - | Indicates there are no students in the group. |
| * | Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. |
| ** | When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size) |
| n/a | Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. |
| TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting | |||