| Texas Education Agency | |||
| 2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Summary | |||
| GLENDA DAWSON H S (020908007) - PEARLAND ISD - BRAZORIA COUNTY | |||
| Group | State | District | Campus | Ever Enrolled In College |
Ever Enrolled, No Certification or Degree |
Never Found in College |
Level 1 Certificate Earned |
Level 2 Certificate Earned |
Industry-based Certification Earned |
Graduated with 2 Year Degree |
Graduated with 4 Year Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class of 2017 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 24.0% | 20.0% | 80.6% | 48.5% | 19.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.8% | 25.2% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 76.0% | 80.0% | 93.0% | 28.2% | 6.6% | 1.7% | 0.0% | * | 8.3% | 54.9% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 90.5% | 32.2% | 9.1% | 1.4% | 0.0% | * | 8.0% | 48.9% |
| Class of 2016 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 21.5% | 19.5% | 75.2% | 44.0% | 24.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.5% | 23.9% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 78.5% | 80.5% | 93.8% | 31.1% | 5.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.8% | 55.1% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 90.2% | 33.6% | 9.5% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.3% | 49.0% |
| Class of 2015 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 24.6% | 22.7% | 75.5% | 48.1% | 24.5% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.7% | 20.8% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 75.4% | 77.3% | 91.7% | 32.8% | 8.3% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.8% | 50.8% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 88.0% | 36.3% | 12.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.3% | 44.0% |
| Class of 2014 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 23.3% | 21.0% | 83.7% | 40.8% | 16.3% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 15.3% | 25.5% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 76.7% | 79.0% | 94.0% | 30.2% | 5.7% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.0% | 57.6% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 91.9% | 32.4% | 7.9% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.9% | 50.9% |
| Class of 2013 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 23.1% | 19.7% | 73.6% | 53.9% | 26.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.6% | 13.2% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 76.9% | 80.3% | 91.9% | 30.4% | 7.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.3% | 52.7% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 88.3% | 35.0% | 11.5% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.0% | 44.9% |
| Class of 2012 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 25.2% | 30.1% | 87.2% | 54.1% | 12.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.3% | 21.8% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 74.8% | 69.9% | 91.9% | 35.6% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.7% | 47.6% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 90.5% | 41.2% | 9.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.5% | 39.8% |
| Class of 2011 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 23.0% | 21.1% | 72.5% | 43.9% | 25.5% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.2% | 18.4% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 77.0% | 78.9% | 87.2% | 35.2% | 12.0% | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.9% | 41.4% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 84.1% | 37.0% | 14.8% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.0% | 36.6% |
| Class of 2010 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 20.3% | 19.5% | 78.8% | 43.5% | 21.2% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.4% | 20.0% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 79.7% | 80.5% | 86.9% | 37.8% | 12.8% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.1% | 38.6% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 85.4% | 38.9% | 14.4% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.2% | 35.0% |
| Class of 2009 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 18.6% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 81.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Class of 2008 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 15.2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 84.8% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC). | |
| - | Indicates there are no students in the group. |
| * | Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. |
| ** | When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size) |
| n/a | Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. |
| TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting | |||