Texas Education Agency                     
2022 Region Summary
REGION 17: LUBBOCK

Campus Ratings by School Type


Bar chart of C_RATING

  All Campuses School Type
Acountability
Rating
Count Percent Elementary Middle School High School K-12
A 55 28.8% 24 28.2% 1 2.7% 14 37.8% 16 50.0%
B 86 45.0% 35 41.2% 17 45.9% 20 54.1% 14 43.8%
C 29 15.2% 15 17.6% 12 32.4% 1 2.7% 1 3.1%
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 21 11.0% 11 12.9% 7 18.9% 2 5.4% 1 3.1%
A - C or SB1365 Total 191 100.0% 85 100.0% 37 100.0% 37 100.0% 32 100.0%
Not Rated 16 0 4 6 6
Other Total 16 0 4 6 6
Total 207 85 41 43 38

Campus Ratings by Poverty Level


Bar chart of C_RATING

  All Campuses Poverty Level
Acountability
Rating
Count Percent High Poverty Moderate Poverty Low Poverty
A 55 28.8% 6 9.4% 45 36.6% 4 100.0%
B 86 45.0% 29 45.3% 57 46.3% 0 0.0%
C 29 15.2% 19 29.7% 10 8.1% 0 0.0%
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 21 11.0% 10 15.6% 11 8.9% 0 0.0%
A - C or SB1365 Total 191 100.0% 64 100.0% 123 100.0% 4 100.0%
Not Rated 16 8 7 1
Other Total 16 8 7 1
Total 207 72 130 5

District Ratings by Poverty Level


Bar chart of D_RATING

  All Districts Poverty Level
Acountability
Rating
Count Percent High Poverty Moderate Poverty Low Poverty
A 25 41.7% 3 23.1% 19 43.2% 3 100.0%
B 32 53.3% 10 76.9% 22 50.0% 0 0.0%
C 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 1 2.3% 0 0.0%
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 2 3.3% 0 0.0% 2 4.5% 0 0.0%
A - C or SB1365 Total 60 100.0% 13 100.0% 44 100.0% 3 100.0%
Not Rated 0 0 0 0
Data Under Review 1 1 0 0
Other Total 1 1 0 0
Total 61 14 44 3

Traditional and Charter Campus Ratings


Bar chart of C_RATING

  All Campuses School Type
Acountability
Rating
Count Percent Traditional Campuses Charter Campuses
A 55 28.8% 54 28.7% 1 33.3%
B 86 45.0% 85 45.2% 1 33.3%
C 29 15.2% 29 15.4% 0 0.0%
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 21 11.0% 20 10.6% 1 33.3%
A - C or SB1365 Total 191 100.0% 188 100.0% 3 100.0%
Not Rated 16 16 0
Other Total 16 16 0
Total 207 204 3

Traditional and Charter District Ratings


Bar chart of D_RATING

  All Districts School Type
Acountability
Rating
Count Percent Traditional Districts Charter Operators
A 25 41.7% 24 41.4% 1 50.0%
B 32 53.3% 32 55.2% 0 0.0%
C 1 1.7% 1 1.7% 0 0.0%
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 2 3.3% 1 1.7% 1 50.0%
A - C or SB1365 Total 60 100.0% 58 100.0% 2 100.0%
Not Rated 0 0 0
Data Under Review 1 0 1
Other Total 1 0 1
Total 61 58 3

Alternative Education Accountability Ratings by Campus Type


Bar chart of C_RATING

  School Type
Acountability
Rating
Total AEA Campuses Dropout Recovery Schools* Residential Facilities
A 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 0
B 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 0
C 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 0
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 0
A - C or SB1365 Total 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 0
Not Rated 2 0 2
Other Total 2 0 2
Total 8 6 2
*Campuses identified as both a Residential Treatment Facility (RTF) and a Dropout Recovery School (DRS) are counted as an RTF.

Campus Distinction Designations


Distictions Number Percent of
Total Evaluated
Not Earned 52 30.6%
Total Earned 118 69.4%
Total Evaluated  170 100.0%
Not Eligible 37
 
Totals  207

  Number of Campus Distinctions Evaluated  
Number of
Distinctions Earned
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Number Percent of
Total Evaluated
7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.2%
6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 7.1%
5 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8.2%
4 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 8.8%
3 11 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 12.4%
2 18 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 30 17.6%
1 16 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 14.1%
0 22 15 0 2 0 0 0 13 52 30.6%
Totals  92 60 2 3 0 0 0 13 170 100.0%

Overall Rating by Domain Rating


Campus
  Student Achievement School Progress Closing The Gaps  
Accountability
Rating
A B C Not Rated Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 A B C Not Rated Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 A B C Not Rated Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 Total
Count
A 46 5 3 1 0 46 6 0 3 0 37 14 1 3 0 55
B 10 37 28 4 7 25 53 3 5 0 2 24 54 5 1 86
C 0 0 11 3 15 0 5 19 4 1 0 0 19 4 6 29
Data Under Review 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 0 0 1 0 20 0 0 4 1 16 0 0 1 1 19 21
Not Rated 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 16 0 16
Totals  56 42 43 24 42 71 64 26 29 17 39 38 75 29 26 207

District
  Student Achievement School Progress Closing The Gaps  
Accountability
Rating
A B C Not Rated Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 A B C Not Rated Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 A B C Not Rated Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 Total
Count
A 22 3 0 0 0 22 3 0 0 0 18 7 0 0 0 25
B 2 25 5 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 1 10 21 0 0 32
C 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Data Under Review 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Not Rated: Senate Bill 1365 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2
Not Rated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals  24 29 5 0 3 35 22 2 0 2 19 17 23 0 2 61

Identification of Schools for Improvement


2022 Identification of Schools for Improvement Number Percent
Campus is NOT identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement,
Targeted Support and Improvement, or Additional Targeted Support.
170 82.1%
Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2021 and 2022. 3 1.4%
Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2021 and
Comprehensive progress in 2022.
5 2.4%
Campuses identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement in 2022. 5 2.4%
Campuses identified for Targeted Support and Improvement in 2022. 23 11.1%
Campuses identified for Additional Targeted Support in 2022. 1 0.5%
Totals 207 100.0%

     Released August 2022 TEA | School Programs | Assessment and Reporting | Performance Reporting