2022 Accountability Reports
Accountability Rating Overall Summary A-F Accountability Campus Listing Accountability Ratings Domain Overview
STAAR Performance College, Career, and Military Readiness Graduation Rate
Academic Growth Relative Performance
Closing the Gaps Identification of Schools for Improvement
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth (AG) Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the Gaps (CTG) Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation Summary Campus Comparison Group
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness Indicators
STAAR Performance
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]
 
  Texas Education Agency  
2022 STAAR Performance
SAMUEL HOUSTON EL (236902103) - HUNTSVILLE ISD - WALKER COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Science Social
Studies		 Totals Percentages
Total Tests 156 156 - - 312
Approaches GL or Above 115 105 - - 220 71%
Meets GL or Above 78 58 - - 136 44%
Masters GL 36 27 - - 63 20%
Total Percentage Points 135%
Component Score 45

Data Table


  All
Students		 African
American		 Hispanic White American
Indian		 Asian Pacific
Islander		 Two or
More
Races		 Econ
Disadv		 EB/EL
(Current)		 EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)		 Special
Ed
(Current)		 Special
Ed
(Former)		 Continu-
ously
Enrolled		 Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 71% 67% 76% 72% * 67% - - 68% 63% 75% 46% * 71% 69%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 44% 34% 56% 47% * 50% - - 39% 38% 58% 37% * 43% 47%
At Masters GL Standard 20% 17% 24% 21% * 17% - - 17% 6% 25% 13% * 21% 17%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 220 88 52 75 * ** - - 145 10 18 25 * 176 44
At Meets GL Standard or Above 136 45 38 49 * ** - - 84 6 14 20 * 106 30
At Masters GL Standard 63 23 16 22 * ** - - 37 1 6 7 * 52 11
Total Tests 312 132 68 104 * ** - - 214 16 24 54 * 248 64
Participation
% participation 2020-21 94% 92% 94% 98% - 100% - 100% 93% 100% 100% 81% * 96% 89%
% participation 2021-22 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% - - 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 74% 71% 79% 73% * * - - 73% 63% 75% 52% * 74% 72%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 50% 39% 62% 56% * * - - 45% 38% 58% 41% * 48% 56%
At Masters GL Standard 23% 23% 24% 23% * * - - 21% 0% 25% 15% * 23% 25%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 115 47 27 38 * * - - 78 5 9 14 * 92 23
At Meets GL Standard or Above 78 26 21 29 * * - - 48 3 7 11 * 60 18
At Masters GL Standard 36 15 8 12 * * - - 22 0 3 4 * 28 8
Total Tests 156 66 34 52 * * - - 107 8 12 27 * 124 32
Participation
% participation 2020-21 95% 92% 97% 97% - * - 100% 94% 100% 100% 86% * 96% 91%
% participation 2021-22 100% 100% 100% 100% * * - - 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 67% 62% 74% 71% * * - - 63% 63% 75% 41% * 68% 66%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 37% 29% 50% 38% * * - - 34% 38% 58% 33% * 37% 38%
At Masters GL Standard 17% 12% 24% 19% * * - - 14% 13% 25% 11% * 19% 9%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 105 41 25 37 * * - - 67 5 9 11 * 84 21
At Meets GL Standard or Above 58 19 17 20 * * - - 36 3 7 9 * 46 12
At Masters GL Standard 27 8 8 10 * * - - 15 1 3 3 * 24 3
Total Tests 156 66 34 52 * * - - 107 8 12 27 * 124 32
Participation
% participation 2020-21 95% 92% 97% 97% - * - 100% 94% 100% 100% 86% * 96% 91%
% participation 2021-22 100% 100% 100% 100% * * - - 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2022 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting