Texas Education Agency  
2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Yearly Details
PSJA THOMAS JEFFERSON T-STEM EARLY COLLEGE H S (108909009) - PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD - HIDALGO COUNTY

Years Out
From
Graduation
Group State District Campus Enrolled In
College
Continued
College
Enrollment
Not Found
in College
Level 1
Certificate
Earned
Level 2
Certificate
Earned
Industry-based
Certification
Earned
Graduated
with
2 Year
Degree
Graduated
with
4 Year
Degree
Class of 2023
1 Economically Disadvantaged 53.5% 94.3% 95.1% 83.7% - 8.2% ** 0.0% ** ** 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 46.5% 5.7% 4.9% 85.7% - 0.0% * 0.0% * * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.8% - 7.8% 7.8% 0.0% 30.3% 35.9% 0.0%
Class of 2022
1 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 91.3% 96.2% 73.2% - ** * 0.0% ** ** 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 8.7% 3.8% 83.3% - * 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 73.6% - 10.1% * 0.0% 51.6% 30.2% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 91.3% 96.2% ** ** ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 5.9%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 8.7% 3.8% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 59.8% 57.9% 8.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 5.7%
Class of 2021
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 93.6% 91.6% 77.7% - 15.2% 3.1% 0.0% ** 46.2% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 6.4% 8.4% 94.4% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 61.1% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.1% - 14.0% 2.8% 0.0% 19.5% 47.4% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 93.6% 91.6% 68.0% 63.5% 13.2% * 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 6.4% 8.4% 88.9% 88.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 69.8% 65.6% 12.1% * 0.0% 0.0% * 5.1%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 93.6% 91.6% 59.4% 55.3% 12.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 15.7%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 6.4% 8.4% 72.2% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.5% 56.7% 11.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 17.2%
Class of 2020
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.5% 93.6% 77.8% - 11.6% 2.7% 0.0% 18.0% 56.6% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 5.5% 6.4% 100.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 69.2% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.2% - 10.9% 2.5% 0.0% 16.8% 57.4% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.5% 93.6% 64.6% 61.4% 9.5% * 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 5.5% 6.4% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.8% 63.9% 8.9% * 0.0% 0.0% * 4.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.5% 93.6% 55.0% 52.4% 9.5% 0.0% * 0.0% * 15.3%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 5.5% 6.4% 84.6% 84.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.2%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 56.9% 54.5% 8.9% 0.0% * 0.0% * 17.3%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.5% 93.6% 34.9% 33.9% 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 5.5% 6.4% 53.9% 53.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 36.1% 35.2% 8.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 11.4%
Class of 2019
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.0% 91.7% 78.9% - 13.9% * 0.0% ** 50.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 6.0% 8.3% 93.3% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 66.7% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.1% - 12.7% * 0.0% 14.9% 51.4% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.0% 91.7% 68.7% 67.5% 13.3% 0.0% * 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 6.0% 8.3% 93.3% 93.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.7% 69.6% 12.2% 0.0% * 0.0% * 6.1%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.0% 91.7% 60.2% 55.4% 12.1% * 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 6.0% 8.3% 80.0% 80.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 61.9% 57.5% 11.1% * 0.0% 0.0% * 13.8%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.0% 91.7% 43.4% 38.0% 11.5% * 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 6.0% 8.3% 53.3% 53.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 44.2% 39.2% 10.5% * 0.0% 0.0% * 13.3%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 94.0% 91.7% 28.3% 22.9% 11.5% 0.0% * 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 6.0% 8.3% 40.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 29.3% 23.8% 10.5% 0.0% * 0.0% * 8.8%
Class of 2018
1 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 91.0% 83.1% 75.2% - ** * 0.0% 0.0% 43.4% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 9.0% 16.9% 82.6% - * 0.0% 0.0% * 65.2% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.5% - 18.4% * 0.0% * 47.1% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 91.0% 83.1% 63.7% 58.4% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 9.0% 16.9% 82.6% 78.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.9% 61.8% 14.7% * 0.0% 0.0% * *
3 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 91.0% 83.1% 54.9% 52.2% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 9.0% 16.9% 65.2% 65.2% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 56.6% 54.4% 14.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 15.4%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 91.0% 83.1% 38.9% 35.4% ** * 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 9.0% 16.9% 56.5% 47.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 41.9% 37.5% 12.5% * 0.0% 0.0% 4.4% 10.3%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 91.0% 83.1% 30.1% 26.6% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 9.0% 16.9% 34.8% 26.1% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 30.9% 26.5% 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 6.6%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 91.0% 83.1% 29.2% 19.5% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 9.0% 16.9% 26.1% 21.7% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 28.7% 19.9% 10.3% * * 0.0% * *
Class of 2017
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 87.1% 68.5% 88.2% - ** * 0.0% * 45.9% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 12.9% 31.5% 94.9% - * * 0.0% * 61.5% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.3% - 8.1% 4.0% 0.0% 4.8% 50.8% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 87.1% 68.5% 69.4% 68.2% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 12.9% 31.5% 76.9% 76.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.8% 71.0% 7.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% *
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 87.1% 68.5% 61.2% 58.8% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 14.1%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 12.9% 31.5% 74.4% 66.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.1%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.3% 61.3% 7.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 16.9%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 87.1% 68.5% 47.1% 42.4% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 12.9% 31.5% 61.5% 53.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 51.6% 46.0% 7.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 13.7%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 87.1% 68.5% 42.4% 31.8% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 11.8%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 12.9% 31.5% 48.7% 48.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% 37.1% 6.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 13.7%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 87.1% 68.5% 32.9% 22.4% ** 0.0% * 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 12.9% 31.5% 28.2% 25.6% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 31.5% 23.4% 4.8% 0.0% * 0.0% * *
Class of 2016
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 87.2% 75.0% 80.2% - ** * 0.0% 0.0% 47.9% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 12.8% 25.0% 93.8% - * * 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.6% - 13.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 51.6% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 87.2% 75.0% 69.8% 65.6% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 12.8% 25.0% 93.8% 93.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ** *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.8% 72.7% 10.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.0% 5.5%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 87.2% 75.0% 61.5% 56.3% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * 20.8%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 12.8% 25.0% 71.9% 71.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.6%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 64.1% 60.2% 10.2% * 0.0% 0.0% * 19.5%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 87.2% 75.0% 35.4% 31.3% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 10.4%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 12.8% 25.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 39.1% 35.9% 9.4% 0.0% * 0.0% * 14.1%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 87.2% 75.0% 29.2% 22.9% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 12.8% 25.0% 43.8% 34.4% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 32.8% 25.8% 8.6% * 0.0% 0.0% * *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 87.2% 75.0% 29.2% 21.9% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 12.8% 25.0% 43.8% 34.4% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 32.8% 25.0% 8.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 4.7%
Class of 2015
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 85.9% 72.0% 83.1% - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.1% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 14.1% 28.0% 93.3% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 86.0% - 14.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.6% *
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 85.9% 72.0% 70.1% 67.5% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 14.1% 28.0% 83.3% 83.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 73.8% 72.0% 12.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 85.9% 72.0% 58.4% 55.8% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * 18.2%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 14.1% 28.0% 63.3% 63.3% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 59.8% 57.9% 11.2% * 0.0% 0.0% * 18.7%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 85.9% 72.0% 40.3% 36.4% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 14.1% 28.0% 50.0% 40.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 43.0% 37.4% 10.3% * 0.0% 0.0% * 10.3%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 85.9% 72.0% 39.0% 29.9% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 14.1% 28.0% 36.7% 26.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 38.3% 29.0% 10.3% * 0.0% 0.0% * 6.5%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 85.9% 72.0% 23.4% 20.8% ** 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 14.1% 28.0% 36.7% 26.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 27.1% 22.4% 10.3% 0.0% * 0.0% * *
Class of 2014
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 88.3% 82.1% 87.5% - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 11.7% 17.9% 85.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.2% - 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 51.3% *
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 88.3% 82.1% 76.6% 75.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 11.7% 17.9% 71.4% 71.4% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.6% 74.4% 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 88.3% 82.1% 62.5% 60.9% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 11.7% 17.9% 64.3% 64.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 62.8% 61.5% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 20.5%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 88.3% 82.1% 51.6% 42.2% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 11.7% 17.9% 35.7% 35.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 48.7% 41.0% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 16.7%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 88.3% 82.1% 43.8% ** ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 11.7% 17.9% 42.9% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 43.6% 35.9% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 14.1%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 88.3% 82.1% ** ** 9.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 11.7% 17.9% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 24.4% 21.8% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2013
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 87.1% 80.8% 76.2% - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 12.9% 19.2% 93.3% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.7% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.5% - 18.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.9% *
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 87.1% 80.8% 68.3% 66.7% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 12.9% 19.2% 46.7% 46.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 64.1% 62.8% 16.7% * 0.0% 0.0% * *
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 87.1% 80.8% 61.9% 58.7% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 12.9% 19.2% 66.7% 46.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 62.8% 56.4% 15.4% * 0.0% 0.0% * 18.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 87.1% 80.8% 46.0% 36.5% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 12.9% 19.2% 53.3% 53.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 47.4% 39.7% 12.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 16.7%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 87.1% 80.8% 34.9% 28.6% ** * 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 12.9% 19.2% 33.3% 33.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 34.6% 29.5% 12.8% * 0.0% 0.0% * 9.0%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 87.1% 80.8% ** ** 14.3% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 12.9% 19.2% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 24.4% 19.2% 11.5% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2012
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 87.9% 87.5% 91.4% - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 48.6% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 12.1% 12.5% 90.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.3% - 7.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 48.8% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 87.9% 87.5% 78.6% 77.1% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 7.1%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 12.1% 12.5% 90.0% 90.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% 78.8% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 6.3%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 87.9% 87.5% 60.0% 60.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 12.1% 12.5% 90.0% 90.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 63.8% 63.8% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 17.5%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 87.9% 87.5% 54.3% 45.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 12.1% 12.5% 60.0% 60.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 55.0% 47.5% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 87.9% 87.5% 38.6% ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 8.6%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 12.1% 12.5% 50.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 40.0% 37.5% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 7.5%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 87.9% 87.5% 28.6% 18.6% * * 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 12.1% 12.5% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% * 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 31.3% 22.5% * * * 0.0% * *
Class of 2011
1 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 85.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 14.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 85.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 14.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 85.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 14.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 85.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 14.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 85.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 14.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 85.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 14.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2010
1 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 86.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 13.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 86.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 13.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 86.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 13.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 86.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 13.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 86.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 13.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 86.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 13.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2009
1 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 86.0% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 14.0% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 86.0% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 14.0% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 86.0% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 14.0% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 86.0% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 14.0% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 86.0% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 14.0% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 86.0% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 14.0% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2008
1 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 83.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 16.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 83.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 16.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 83.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 16.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 83.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 16.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 83.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 16.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 83.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 16.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -

  Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC).
- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size)
n/a Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

      TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting