Texas Education Agency  
2022-23 Postsecondary Outcomes Yearly Details
HARMONY SCHOOL OF INNOVATION - KATY (101862005) - HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS - HOUSTON WEST - HARRIS COUNTY

Years Out
From
Graduation
Group State District Campus Enrolled In
College
Continued
College
Enrollment
Not Found
in College
Level 1
Certificate
Earned
Level 2
Certificate
Earned
Industry-based
Certification
Earned
Graduated
with
2 Year
Degree
Graduated
with
4 Year
Degree
Class of 2022
1 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 60.1% 51.5% 85.7% - 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 31.4% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 39.9% 48.5% 78.8% - 15.2% 0.0% 0.0% 15.2% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82.4% - 14.7% 0.0% 0.0% 23.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2021
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 51.4% 38.3% 82.6% - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 48.6% 61.7% 94.6% - * 0.0% 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% - 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18.3% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 51.4% 38.3% 82.6% 82.6% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 48.6% 61.7% 89.2% 89.2% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 86.7% 86.7% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2020
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 51.9% 54.3% 100.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 48.1% 45.7% 90.5% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 51.9% 54.3% 92.0% 92.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 48.1% 45.7% 85.7% 85.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.1% 89.1% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 51.9% 54.3% 84.0% 84.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 48.1% 45.7% 76.2% 71.4% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.4% 78.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2019
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 57.1% 66.7% 86.4% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 42.9% 33.3% 100.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.9% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 57.1% 66.7% 81.8% 81.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 42.9% 33.3% 81.8% 81.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 81.8% 81.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 57.1% 66.7% 81.8% 77.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 42.9% 33.3% 81.8% 81.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 81.8% 78.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 57.1% 66.7% 77.3% 72.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * **
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 42.9% 33.3% 81.8% 72.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.8% 72.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 27.3%
Class of 2018
1 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 50.3% 43.2% 81.3% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 49.7% 56.8% 81.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 81.1% - 18.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 50.3% 43.2% 81.3% 81.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 49.7% 56.8% 76.2% 71.4% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.4% 75.7% 16.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 50.3% 43.2% 81.3% 81.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 49.7% 56.8% 76.2% 71.4% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.4% 75.7% 16.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 50.3% 43.2% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 49.7% 56.8% 66.7% 66.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 59.5% 59.5% 16.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 16.2%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 50.3% 43.2% 37.5% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 49.7% 56.8% 57.1% ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 48.7% 40.5% 16.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 29.7%
Class of 2017
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 42.6% 18.8% 100.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 57.4% 81.3% 84.6% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 42.6% 18.8% 83.3% 83.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 57.4% 81.3% 84.6% 80.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 84.4% 81.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 42.6% 18.8% 83.3% 83.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 57.4% 81.3% 76.9% 76.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.1% 78.1% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 42.6% 18.8% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 57.4% 81.3% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 30.8%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.9% 71.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 25.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 42.6% 18.8% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 57.4% 81.3% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.9% 46.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 42.6% 18.8% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 57.4% 81.3% ** 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 43.8% 40.6% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Class of 2016
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 48.4% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 51.6% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 48.4% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 51.6% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 48.4% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 51.6% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 48.4% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 51.6% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 48.4% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 51.6% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 48.4% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 51.6% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2015
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 47.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 52.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 47.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 52.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 47.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 52.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 47.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 52.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 47.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 52.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 47.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 52.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2014
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 52.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 47.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 52.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 47.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 52.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 47.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 52.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 47.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 52.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 47.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 52.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 47.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2013
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2012
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2011
1 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2010
1 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2009
1 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2008
1 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% - - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -

  Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC).
- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size)
n/a Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

      TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting