| Texas Education Agency | |||
| 2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Summary | |||
| GUNTER H S (091917001) - GUNTER ISD - GRAYSON COUNTY | |||
| Group | State | District | Campus | Ever Enrolled In College |
Ever Enrolled, No Certification or Degree |
Never Found in College |
Level 1 Certificate Earned |
Level 2 Certificate Earned |
Industry-based Certification Earned |
Graduated with 2 Year Degree |
Graduated with 4 Year Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class of 2017 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 19.4% | 19.4% | 66.7% | * | * | 0.0% | * | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 80.6% | 80.6% | 84.0% | ** | ** | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | ** | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 80.7% | 29.0% | 19.4% | * | * | 0.0% | 11.3% | 33.9% |
| Class of 2016 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 22.4% | 22.4% | 80.0% | * | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 77.6% | 77.6% | 86.5% | ** | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ** | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 85.1% | 31.3% | 14.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 14.9% | 38.8% |
| Class of 2015 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 28.8% | 28.8% | 71.4% | 38.1% | 28.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 71.2% | 71.2% | 90.4% | 28.9% | 9.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ** | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 84.9% | 31.5% | 15.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.0% | 42.5% |
| Class of 2014 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 36.1% | 36.1% | 77.3% | 22.7% | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ** | 27.3% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 63.9% | 63.9% | 89.7% | 33.3% | * | 0.0% | * | 0.0% | * | 46.2% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 85.3% | 29.5% | 14.8% | 0.0% | * | 0.0% | 14.8% | 39.3% |
| Class of 2013 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 24.1% | 24.1% | 79.0% | 36.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 26.3% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 75.9% | 75.9% | 91.7% | 38.3% | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 46.7% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 88.6% | 38.0% | 11.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.9% | 41.8% |
| Class of 2012 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 36.7% | 36.7% | 63.6% | 27.3% | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 27.3% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 63.3% | 63.3% | 89.5% | 36.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 50.0% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 80.0% | 33.3% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 41.7% |
| Class of 2011 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 52.4% | 23.8% | 47.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 83.3% | 31.0% | 16.7% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 73.0% | 28.6% | 27.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.9% | 34.9% |
| Class of 2010 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 27.3% | 27.3% | 61.1% | 38.9% | 38.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 72.7% | 72.7% | 77.1% | 29.2% | 22.9% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 72.7% | 31.8% | 27.3% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 31.8% |
| Class of 2009 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 12.8% | 12.8% | 70.0% | * | * | * | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 87.2% | 87.2% | 83.8% | ** | ** | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.3% | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 82.1% | 37.2% | 16.7% | 7.7% | * | 0.0% | 9.0% | 28.2% |
| Class of 2008 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 11.5% | 11.5% | 66.7% | * | * | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 88.5% | 88.5% | 84.1% | ** | ** | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 82.1% | 43.6% | 18.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 33.3% |
| Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC). | |
| - | Indicates there are no students in the group. |
| * | Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. |
| ** | When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size) |
| n/a | Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. |
| TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting | |||