Texas Education Agency  
2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Yearly Details
HESTER JUVENILE DETENT (031912201) - SAN BENITO CISD - CAMERON COUNTY

Years Out
From
Graduation
Group State District Campus Enrolled In
College
Continued
College
Enrollment
Not Found
in College
Level 1
Certificate
Earned
Level 2
Certificate
Earned
Industry-based
Certification
Earned
Graduated
with
2 Year
Degree
Graduated
with
4 Year
Degree
Class of 2023
1 Economically Disadvantaged 53.5% 75.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 46.5% 24.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2022
1 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 81.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 18.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 81.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 18.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2021
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 85.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 14.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 85.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 14.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 85.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 14.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2020
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 82.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 17.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 82.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 17.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 82.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 17.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 82.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 17.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2019
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 84.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 15.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 84.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 15.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 84.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 15.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 84.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 15.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 84.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 15.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2018
1 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 75.8% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 24.2% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 75.8% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 24.2% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 75.8% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 24.2% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 75.8% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 24.2% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 75.8% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 24.2% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 75.8% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 24.2% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2017
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 82.1% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 17.9% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 82.1% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 17.9% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 82.1% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 17.9% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 82.1% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 17.9% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 82.1% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 17.9% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 82.1% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 17.9% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2016
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 77.6% - * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 22.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 77.6% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 22.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 77.6% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 22.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 77.6% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 22.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 77.6% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 22.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 77.6% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 22.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2015
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 66.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 33.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 66.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 33.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 66.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 33.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 66.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 33.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 66.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 33.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 66.5% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 33.5% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2014
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 81.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 18.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 81.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 18.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 81.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 18.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 81.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 18.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 81.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 18.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 81.7% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 18.3% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2013
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 84.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 15.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 84.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 15.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 84.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 15.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 84.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 15.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 84.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 15.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 84.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 15.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2012
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 82.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 17.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 82.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 17.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 82.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 17.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 82.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 17.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 82.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 17.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 82.3% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 17.7% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2011
1 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2010
1 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 79.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 20.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 79.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 20.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 79.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 20.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 79.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 20.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 79.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 20.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 79.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 20.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2009
1 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 80.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 19.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 80.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 19.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 80.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 19.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 80.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 19.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 80.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 19.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 80.9% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 19.1% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
Class of 2008
1 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
2 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
3 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
4 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
5 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -
6 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 82.6% - - - - - - - - -
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 17.4% - - - - - - - - -
All Students 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - - - -

  Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC).
- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size)
n/a Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

      TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting