Texas Education Agency  
2021 STAAR Performance
WORTHAM H S (081905002) - WORTHAM ISD - FREESTONE COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social
Studies
Totals Percentages
Total Tests 82 40 - 37 26 185
Approaches GL or Above 61 27 - 30 26 144 78%
Meets GL or Above 41 13 - 13 19 86 46%
Masters GL 5 7 - 3 12 27 15%
Total Percentage Points - 139%
Component Score - 46

Data Table


  All
Students
African
American
Hispanic White American
Indian
Asian Pacific
Islander
Two or
More
Races
Econ
Disadv
EB/EL
(Current)
EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)
Special
Ed
(Current)
Special
Ed
(Former)
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 78% 73% 69% 81% * - - * 73% * * 55% * 78% 76%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 46% 42% 37% 48% * - - * 38% * * 36% * 48% 43%
At Masters GL Standard 15% 8% 9% 18% * - - * 13% * * 18% * 14% 17%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 144 19 24 97 * - - * 77 * * 6 * 112 32
At Meets GL Standard or Above 86 11 13 58 * - - * 40 * * 4 * 68 18
At Masters GL Standard 27 2 3 21 * - - * 14 * * 2 * 20 7
Total Tests 185 26 35 120 * - - * 105 * * 11 * 143 42
Participation
% participation 2018-19 99% 100% 94% 100% * - - 100% 99% - * 96% - 98% 100%
% participation 2020-21 99% 100% 98% 99% * - - * 99% * 100% 100% * 99% 98%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 74% 64% 71% 78% - - - * 70% * * * * 76% 70%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 50% 43% 41% 54% - - - * 40% * * * * 53% 40%
At Masters GL Standard 6% 0% 0% 10% - - - * 4% * * * * 5% 10%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 61 ** 12 39 - - - * 33 * * * * 47 14
At Meets GL Standard or Above 41 ** 7 27 - - - * 19 * * * * 33 8
At Masters GL Standard 5 ** 0 5 - - - * 2 * * * * 3 2
Total Tests 82 ** 17 50 - - - * 47 * * * * 62 20
Participation
% participation 2018-19 100% 100% 100% 100% * - - * 100% - * 100% - 100% 100%
% participation 2020-21 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - * 100% * * * * 100% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 68% * 50% 73% - - - * 60% - - * * 69% 63%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 33% * 0% 40% - - - * 15% - - * * 31% 38%
At Masters GL Standard 18% * 0% 20% - - - * 15% - - * * 16% 25%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 27 * 3 22 - - - * 12 - - * * 22 5
At Meets GL Standard or Above 13 * 0 12 - - - * 3 - - * * 10 3
At Masters GL Standard 7 * 0 6 - - - * 3 - - * * 5 2
Total Tests 40 * 6 30 - - - * 20 - - * * 32 8
Participation
% participation 2018-19 93% * 75% 100% * - - * 95% - - 80% - 89% 100%
% participation 2020-21 95% * 89% 97% - - - * 96% * * * * 97% 90%
Science
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 81% * 50% 85% - - - * 70% - - * * 80% 86%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 35% * 17% 38% - - - * 25% - - * * 33% 43%
At Masters GL Standard 8% * 0% 12% - - - * 5% - - * * 7% 14%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 30 * 3 22 - - - * 14 - - * * 24 6
At Meets GL Standard or Above 13 * 1 10 - - - * 5 - - * * 10 3
At Masters GL Standard 3 * 0 3 - - - * 1 - - * * 2 1
Total Tests 37 * 6 26 - - - * 20 - - * * 30 7
Participation
% participation 2018-19 100% 100% 100% 100% * - - * 100% - * * - 100% 100%
% participation 2020-21 100% * 100% 100% - - - * 100% * * * * 100% 100%
Social Studies
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 100% 100% 100% 100% * - - - 100% - * 100% - 100% 100%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 73% 80% 83% 64% * - - - 72% - * 80% - 79% 57%
At Masters GL Standard 46% 40% 50% 50% * - - - 44% - * 40% - 53% 29%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 26 ** 6 14 * - - - 18 - * 5 - 19 7
At Meets GL Standard or Above 19 ** 5 9 * - - - 13 - * 4 - 15 4
At Masters GL Standard 12 ** 3 7 * - - - 8 - * 2 - 10 2
Total Tests 26 ** 6 14 * - - - 18 - * 5 - 19 7
Participation
% participation 2018-19 100% * * 100% - - - - 100% - - * - 100% 100%
% participation 2020-21 100% 100% 100% 100% * - - - 100% - * 100% - 100% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2021 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting