Texas Education Agency  
2021 STAAR Performance
WHITE DEER EL (033904102) - WHITE DEER ISD - CARSON COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social
Studies
Totals Percentages
Total Tests 104 105 29 32 - 270
Approaches GL or Above 81 72 13 23 - 189 70%
Meets GL or Above 45 35 7 10 - 97 36%
Masters GL 20 16 1 2 - 39 14%
Total Percentage Points - 120%
Component Score - 40

Data Table


  All
Students
African
American
Hispanic White American
Indian
Asian Pacific
Islander
Two or
More
Races
Econ
Disadv
EB/EL
(Current)
EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)
Special
Ed
(Current)
Special
Ed
(Former)
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 70% - 66% 71% * * - * 66% 56% 56% 45% 60% 69% 73%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 36% - 32% 38% * * - * 24% 33% 33% 13% 20% 37% 34%
At Masters GL Standard 14% - 5% 17% * * - * 10% 11% 11% 0% 20% 15% 13%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 189 - 29 155 * * - * 96 5 5 17 3 133 56
At Meets GL Standard or Above 97 - 14 82 * * - * 35 3 3 5 1 71 26
At Masters GL Standard 39 - 2 36 * * - * 15 1 1 0 1 29 10
Total Tests 270 - 44 217 * * - * 145 9 9 38 5 193 77
Participation
% participation 2018-19 100% - 100% 100% - 100% - * 100% * * 100% * 100% 99%
% participation 2020-21 100% - 100% 100% * * - * 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 78% - 78% 78% * * - * 77% * * 57% * 77% 80%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 43% - 39% 45% * * - * 30% * * 14% * 42% 47%
At Masters GL Standard 19% - 6% 22% * * - * 12% * * 0% * 19% 20%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 81 - 14 65 * * - * 44 * * 8 * 57 24
At Meets GL Standard or Above 45 - 7 37 * * - * 17 * * 2 * 31 14
At Masters GL Standard 20 - 1 18 * * - * 7 * * 0 * 14 6
Total Tests 104 - 18 83 * * - * 57 * * 14 * 74 30
Participation
% participation 2018-19 99% - 100% 99% - * - * 100% * * 100% * 100% 98%
% participation 2020-21 99% - 100% 99% * * - * 98% * * 100% * 99% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 69% - 61% 70% * * - * 60% * * 43% * 69% 67%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 33% - 28% 36% * * - * 26% * * 14% * 37% 23%
At Masters GL Standard 15% - 6% 18% * * - * 14% * * 0% * 19% 7%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 72 - 11 59 * * - * 35 * * 6 * 52 20
At Meets GL Standard or Above 35 - 5 30 * * - * 15 * * 2 * 28 7
At Masters GL Standard 16 - 1 15 * * - * 8 * * 0 * 14 2
Total Tests 105 - 18 84 * * - * 58 * * 14 * 75 30
Participation
% participation 2018-19 100% - 100% 100% - * - * 100% * * 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2020-21 100% - 100% 100% * * - * 100% * * 100% * 100% 100%
Writing
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 45% - * 48% * * - * 40% * * * * 43% 50%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 24% - * 26% * * - * 13% * * * * 29% 13%
At Masters GL Standard 3% - * 4% * * - * 0% * * * * 5% 0%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 13 - * 11 * * - * 6 * * * * 9 4
At Meets GL Standard or Above 7 - * 6 * * - * 2 * * * * 6 1
At Masters GL Standard 1 - * 1 * * - * 0 * * * * 1 0
Total Tests 29 - * 23 * * - * 15 * * * * 21 8
Participation
% participation 2018-19 100% - 100% 100% - * - * 100% * * * * 100% 100%
% participation 2020-21 100% - * 100% * * - * 100% * * * * 100% 100%
Science
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 72% - 60% 74% - - - - 73% - - 43% - 65% 89%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 31% - 20% 33% - - - - 7% - - 14% - 26% 44%
At Masters GL Standard 6% - 0% 7% - - - - 0% - - 0% - 0% 22%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 23 - 3 20 - - - - 11 - - 3 - 15 8
At Meets GL Standard or Above 10 - 1 9 - - - - 1 - - 1 - 6 4
At Masters GL Standard 2 - 0 2 - - - - 0 - - 0 - 0 2
Total Tests 32 - 5 27 - - - - 15 - - 7 - 23 9
Participation
% participation 2018-19 100% - * 100% - - - - 100% - - * - 100% 100%
% participation 2020-21 100% - 100% 100% - - - - 100% - - 100% - 100% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2021 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting