2019-20 Texas Performance Reporting System (TPRS)
STAAR Performance
STAAR Participation
Attendance, Graduation, and Dropout Rates Graduation Profile
Postsecondary Readiness
College, Career, and Military Readiness (CCMR) CCMR-Related Indicators Other Postsecondary Indicators
Postsecondary Outcomes
Postsecondary Outcomes Yearly Details Postsecondary Outcomes Summary Postsecondary Outcomes Visualization
Student Information Staff Information Teacher Salary Distribution
Kindergarten Readiness Pre-Kindergarten Effectiveness based on Kindergarten Readiness Assessments
Accountability Overall Summary Relative Performance History
Accountability Research Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Data Campus and District Type Data Search Completion, Graduation, and Dropouts Data Search Discipline Reports Grade-Level Retention Data Search PEIMS Standard Reports SAT and ACT Data Search and Data Downloads TPEIR
2024-25 Texas Academic Performance Report 2023-24 Texas Academic Performance Report 2022-23 Texas Academic Performance Report 2021-22 Texas Academic Performance Report 2020-21 Texas Academic Performance Report 2019-20 Texas Academic Performance Report 2018-19 Texas Academic Performance Report 2017-18 Texas Academic Performance Report
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate Industry-Based Certifications (IBC)
Assessment Research Portal Results Driven Accountability District Reports Revenue and Expenditures 2024-25 School Report Card State Performance Plan Indicators
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]
 
  Texas Education Agency  
2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Yearly Details
FORESTBURG ISD (169910) - MONTAGUE COUNTY

Years Out
From
Graduation		 Group State Region 09 District Enrolled In
College		 Continued
College
Enrollment		 Not Found
in College		 Level 1
Certificate
Earned		 Level 2
Certificate
Earned		 Industry-based
Certification
Earned		 Graduated
with
2 Year
Degree		 Graduated
with
4 Year
Degree
Class of 2023
1 Economically Disadvantaged 53.5% 49.7% 38.5% * - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 46.5% 50.3% 61.5% * - * * 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.2% - * * 0.0% 84.6% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2022
1 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 46.6% - * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 53.4% - ** - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 46.6% - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 53.4% - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2021
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 43.1% 45.5% * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 56.9% 54.5% * - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 45.5% - * 0.0% 0.0% 72.7% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 43.1% 45.5% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 56.9% 54.5% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% 43.1% 45.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% 56.9% 54.5% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2020
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 45.7% - * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 54.3% - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 45.7% - * * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 54.3% - * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 45.7% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 54.3% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 45.7% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 54.3% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2019
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 46.8% 45.0% 55.6% - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 53.2% 55.0% 72.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.0% - 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 46.8% 45.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 53.2% 55.0% ** ** * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 45.0% 30.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 46.8% 45.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 53.2% 55.0% ** ** * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 46.8% 45.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 53.2% 55.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% 46.8% 45.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% 53.2% 55.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2018
1 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 44.7% - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 55.3% - ** - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% - 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 44.7% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 55.3% - ** ** ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% 38.9% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 44.7% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 55.3% - ** * ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 27.8% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 44.7% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 55.3% - * * ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 44.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 44.7% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 55.3% - * 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * 0.0% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 44.7% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 55.3% - 0.0% 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2017
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 41.8% - 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 58.2% - 60.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% - 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 41.8% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 58.2% - 60.0% 60.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 41.8% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 58.2% - 50.0% 50.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 41.7% 41.7% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 41.8% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 58.2% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 41.8% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 58.2% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 41.8% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 58.2% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 41.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2016
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 39.2% 38.5% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 60.8% 61.5% ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 61.5% - 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 39.2% 38.5% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 60.8% 61.5% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 38.5% 38.5% 38.5% * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 39.2% 38.5% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 60.8% 61.5% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 38.5% * 38.5% * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 39.2% 38.5% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 60.8% 61.5% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 39.2% 38.5% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 60.8% 61.5% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 39.2% 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 60.8% 61.5% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * 0.0% 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2015
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 42.8% 50.0% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 57.2% 50.0% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 42.8% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 57.2% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% 70.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 42.8% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 57.2% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 42.8% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 57.2% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 42.8% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 57.2% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 42.8% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 57.2% 50.0% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Class of 2014
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 44.6% - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 55.4% - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 44.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 55.4% - ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 58.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 44.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 55.4% - ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 66.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 44.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 55.4% - ** * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 58.3% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 44.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 55.4% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 44.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 55.4% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Class of 2013
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 39.6% - 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 60.4% - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 39.6% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 60.4% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 39.6% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 60.4% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 39.6% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 60.4% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 39.6% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 60.4% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 39.6% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 60.4% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2012
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 39.0% - * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 61.0% - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 39.0% - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 61.0% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 39.0% - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 61.0% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 39.0% - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 61.0% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 39.0% - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 61.0% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 39.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 61.0% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2011
1 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 39.3% - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 60.7% - * - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.2% - 53.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 39.3% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 60.7% - * * ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.2% 38.5% 46.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 39.3% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 60.7% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.2% 38.5% 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 39.3% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 60.7% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 39.3% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 60.7% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 39.3% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 60.7% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2010
1 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 34.4% - * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 65.6% - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 63.6% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 34.4% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 65.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 34.4% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 65.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 34.4% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 65.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 34.4% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 65.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 34.4% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 65.6% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2009
1 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 29.7% 35.7% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 70.3% 64.3% ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.4% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 29.7% 35.7% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 70.3% 64.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 29.7% 35.7% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 70.3% 64.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 42.9% 35.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 29.7% 35.7% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 70.3% 64.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 35.7% 35.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 29.7% 35.7% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 70.3% 64.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 29.7% 35.7% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 70.3% 64.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2008
1 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 29.1% - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 70.9% - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 29.1% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 70.9% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 29.1% - * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 70.9% - * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 29.1% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 70.9% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 29.1% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 70.9% - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 29.1% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 70.9% - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

  Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC).
- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size)
n/a Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

      TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting