Accountability Rating Overall Summary A-F Accountability Listing Accountability Ratings Domain Overview
STAAR Performance College, Career, and Military Readiness Graduation Rate
Academic Growth Relative Performance
Closing the Gaps Identification of Schools for Improvement
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth (AG) Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the Gaps (CTG) Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation Summary Campus Comparison Group
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness Indicators
STAAR Performance
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]

  Texas Education Agency  
2019 STAAR Performance
NOCONA MIDDLE (169902041) - NOCONA ISD - MONTAGUE COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social
Studies		 Totals Percentages
Total Tests 157 157 52 47 47 460
Approaches GL or Above 121 127 42 46 42 378 82%
Meets GL or Above 68 57 19 34 25 203 44%
Masters GL 36 15 8 16 10 85 18%
Total Percentage Points - 144%
Component Score - 48

Data Table


  All
Students		 African
American		 Hispanic White American
Indian		 Asian Pacific
Islander		 Two or
More
Races		 Econ
Disadv		 EB/EL
(Current)		 EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)		 Special
Ed
(Current)		 Special
Ed
(Former)		 Continu-
ously
Enrolled		 Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 82% * 82% 81% * * - 88% 78% 66% 77% 40% 71% 84% 77%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 44% * 47% 41% * * - 47% 39% 14% 35% 22% 29% 42% 51%
At Masters GL Standard 18% * 18% 18% * * - 12% 12% 5% 14% 5% 0% 17% 23%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 378 * 134 222 * * - 15 232 38 79 26 5 301 77
At Meets GL Standard or Above 203 * 76 112 * * - 8 116 8 36 14 2 152 51
At Masters GL Standard 85 * 29 49 * * - 2 37 3 14 3 0 62 23
Total Tests 460 * 163 273 * * - 17 299 58 102 65 7 360 100
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% * 100% 100% * 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 77% * 73% 77% * * - 100% 72% 55% 68% 32% * 77% 76%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 43% * 43% 41% * * - 57% 34% 14% 35% 18% * 42% 48%
At Masters GL Standard 23% * 18% 24% * * - 14% 15% 5% 16% 5% * 23% 21%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 121 * 41 70 * * - 7 73 12 25 7 * 96 25
At Meets GL Standard or Above 68 * 24 37 * * - 4 35 3 13 4 * 52 16
At Masters GL Standard 36 * 10 22 * * - 1 15 1 6 1 * 29 7
Total Tests 157 * 56 91 * * - 7 102 22 37 22 * 124 33
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% * 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 81% * 82% 80% * * - 71% 75% 68% 78% 36% * 83% 73%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 36% * 39% 33% * * - 29% 32% 5% 27% 14% * 33% 48%
At Masters GL Standard 10% * 11% 9% * * - 0% 4% 5% 8% 5% * 8% 15%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 127 * 46 73 * * - 5 76 15 29 8 * 103 24
At Meets GL Standard or Above 57 * 22 30 * * - 2 33 1 10 3 * 41 16
At Masters GL Standard 15 * 6 8 * * - 0 4 1 3 1 * 10 5
Total Tests 157 * 56 91 * * - 7 102 22 37 22 * 124 33
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% * 100% 100% * * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
Writing
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 81% - 82% 77% * - - * 77% * 80% 14% * 86% 69%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 37% - 47% 26% * - - * 40% * 50% 14% * 33% 44%
At Masters GL Standard 15% - 24% 6% * - - * 17% * 20% 0% * 14% 19%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 42 - 14 24 * - - * 27 * 8 1 * 31 11
At Meets GL Standard or Above 19 - 8 8 * - - * 14 * 5 1 * 12 7
At Masters GL Standard 8 - 4 2 * - - * 6 * 2 0 * 5 3
Total Tests 52 - 17 31 * - - * 35 * 10 7 * 36 16
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% - 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% - 100% 100% * - - * 100% * 100% 100% * 100% 100%
Science
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 98% - 100% 97% - - - - 97% 100% 100% 86% - 97% 100%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 72% - 65% 77% - - - - 67% 40% 44% 57% - 74% 67%
At Masters GL Standard 34% - 35% 33% - - - - 30% 20% 22% 14% - 29% 56%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 46 - 17 29 - - - - 29 5 9 6 - 37 9
At Meets GL Standard or Above 34 - 11 23 - - - - 20 2 4 4 - 28 6
At Masters GL Standard 16 - 6 10 - - - - 9 1 2 1 - 11 5
Total Tests 47 - 17 30 - - - - 30 5 9 7 - 38 9
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - * - * 100% * 100% 100% - 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% - 100% 100% - * - - 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100%
Social Studies
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 89% - 94% 87% - - - - 90% 80% 89% 57% - 89% 89%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 53% - 65% 47% - - - - 47% 40% 44% 29% - 50% 67%
At Masters GL Standard 21% - 18% 23% - - - - 10% 0% 11% 0% - 18% 33%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 42 - 16 26 - - - - 27 4 8 4 - 34 8
At Meets GL Standard or Above 25 - 11 14 - - - - 14 2 4 2 - 19 6
At Masters GL Standard 10 - 3 7 - - - - 3 0 1 0 - 7 3
Total Tests 47 - 17 30 - - - - 30 5 9 7 - 38 9
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - * - * 100% * 100% 100% - 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% - 100% 100% - * - - 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2019 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting