2019 Accountability Reports
Accountability Rating Overall Summary A-F Accountability Listing Accountability Ratings Domain Overview
STAAR Performance College, Career, and Military Readiness Graduation Rate
Academic Growth Relative Performance
Closing the Gaps Identification of Schools for Improvement
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth (AG) Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the Gaps (CTG) Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation Summary Campus Comparison Group
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness Indicators
STAAR Performance
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]
 
  Texas Education Agency  
2019 STAAR Performance
SMYER H S (110906001) - SMYER ISD - HOCKLEY COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social
Studies		 Totals Percentages
Total Tests 170 105 32 71 86 464
Approaches GL or Above 117 69 26 60 67 339 73%
Meets GL or Above 67 28 14 30 39 178 38%
Masters GL 20 13 5 8 20 66 14%
Total Percentage Points - 125%
Component Score - 42

Data Table


  All
Students		 African
American		 Hispanic White American
Indian		 Asian Pacific
Islander		 Two or
More
Races		 Econ
Disadv		 EB/EL
(Current)		 EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)		 Special
Ed
(Current)		 Special
Ed
(Former)		 Continu-
ously
Enrolled		 Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 73% 38% 71% 78% - - - * 68% 50% 73% 42% 50% 71% 78%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 38% 31% 32% 48% - - - * 33% 17% 23% 5% 13% 39% 36%
At Masters GL Standard 14% 23% 11% 18% - - - * 11% 0% 8% 0% 0% 13% 16%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 339 ** 173 159 - - - * 186 6 19 32 8 244 95
At Meets GL Standard or Above 178 ** 77 97 - - - * 91 2 6 4 2 134 44
At Masters GL Standard 66 ** 26 37 - - - * 31 0 2 0 0 46 20
Total Tests 464 ** 244 203 - - - * 272 12 26 77 16 342 122
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 69% 20% 66% 76% - - - * 64% 50% 75% 31% 40% 67% 74%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 39% 20% 30% 54% - - - * 33% 0% 8% 3% 0% 41% 33%
At Masters GL Standard 12% 20% 10% 14% - - - * 11% 0% 8% 0% 0% 12% 12%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 117 ** 61 54 - - - * 65 3 9 10 2 86 31
At Meets GL Standard or Above 67 ** 28 38 - - - * 33 0 1 1 0 53 14
At Masters GL Standard 20 ** 9 10 - - - * 11 0 1 0 0 15 5
Total Tests 170 ** 93 71 - - - * 101 6 12 32 5 128 42
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - - - * 100% * 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 66% * 63% 73% - - - * 59% * * 33% * 68% 61%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 27% * 21% 33% - - - * 24% * * 0% * 27% 25%
At Masters GL Standard 12% * 6% 19% - - - * 10% * * 0% * 12% 14%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 69 * 33 35 - - - * 35 * * 6 * 52 17
At Meets GL Standard or Above 28 * 11 16 - - - * 14 * * 0 * 21 7
At Masters GL Standard 13 * 3 9 - - - * 6 * * 0 * 9 4
Total Tests 105 * 52 48 - - - * 59 * * 18 * 77 28
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - - - * 100% * 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 99% * 100% 98% - - - * 98% * 100% 100% * 99% 100%
Writing
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 81% * 76% 93% - - - - 75% * * * - 79% 88%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 44% * 41% 50% - - - - 35% * * * - 46% 38%
At Masters GL Standard 16% * 6% 29% - - - - 5% * * * - 17% 13%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 26 * ** 13 - - - - 15 * * * - 19 7
At Meets GL Standard or Above 14 * ** 7 - - - - 7 * * * - 11 3
At Masters GL Standard 5 * ** 4 - - - - 1 * * * - 4 1
Total Tests 32 * ** 14 - - - - 20 * * * - 24 8
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - - - * 100% * * 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% * 100% 100% - - - - 100% * * * - 100% 100%
Science
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 85% * 82% 86% - - - * 81% - * 70% * 79% 96%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 42% * 27% 57% - - - * 38% - * 0% * 42% 43%
At Masters GL Standard 11% * 9% 14% - - - * 8% - * 0% * 8% 17%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 60 * 27 30 - - - * 30 - * 7 * 38 22
At Meets GL Standard or Above 30 * 9 20 - - - * 14 - * 0 * 20 10
At Masters GL Standard 8 * 3 5 - - - * 3 - * 0 * 4 4
Total Tests 71 * 33 35 - - - * 37 - * 10 * 48 23
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - - - - 100% * 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% * 100% 100% - - - * 100% * * 100% * 100% 100%
Social Studies
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 78% * 80% 77% - - - * 75% * 100% 62% * 75% 86%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 45% * 45% 46% - - - * 42% * 50% 23% * 45% 48%
At Masters GL Standard 23% * 20% 26% - - - * 18% * 0% 0% * 22% 29%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 67 * 39 27 - - - * 41 * 6 8 * 49 18
At Meets GL Standard or Above 39 * 22 16 - - - * 23 * 3 3 * 29 10
At Masters GL Standard 20 * 10 9 - - - * 10 * 0 0 * 14 6
Total Tests 86 * 49 35 - - - * 55 * 6 13 * 65 21
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - - - - 100% - * 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% * 100% 100% - - - * 100% * 100% 100% * 100% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2019 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting