Accountability Rating Overall Summary A-F Accountability Listing Accountability Ratings Domain Overview
STAAR Performance College, Career, and Military Readiness Graduation Rate
Academic Growth Relative Performance
Closing the Gaps Identification of Schools for Improvement
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth (AG) Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the Gaps (CTG) Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation Summary Campus Comparison Group
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness Indicators
STAAR Performance
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]

  Texas Education Agency  
2019 STAAR Performance
HOUSTON EL (070903102) - ENNIS ISD - ELLIS COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social
Studies		 Totals Percentages
Total Tests 104 104 - - - 208
Approaches GL or Above 74 87 - - - 161 77%
Meets GL or Above 38 44 - - - 82 39%
Masters GL 19 17 - - - 36 17%
Total Percentage Points - 133%
Component Score - 44

Data Table


  All
Students		 African
American		 Hispanic White American
Indian		 Asian Pacific
Islander		 Two or
More
Races		 Econ
Disadv		 EB/EL
(Current)		 EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)		 Special
Ed
(Current)		 Special
Ed
(Former)		 Continu-
ously
Enrolled		 Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 77% 63% 77% 97% - * - 50% 76% 70% 76% 53% 67% 77% 81%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 39% 30% 33% 81% - * - 17% 36% 20% 26% 20% 0% 37% 50%
At Masters GL Standard 17% 13% 13% 44% - * - 0% 16% 2% 9% 13% 0% 16% 24%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 161 19 106 31 - * - ** 134 45 62 16 4 127 34
At Meets GL Standard or Above 82 9 46 26 - * - ** 64 13 21 6 0 61 21
At Masters GL Standard 36 4 18 14 - * - ** 29 1 7 4 0 26 10
Total Tests 208 30 138 32 - * - ** 176 64 82 30 6 166 42
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% 100% 100% 100% - * - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 71% 53% 70% 94% - * - * 69% 63% 68% 47% * 70% 76%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 37% 27% 32% 75% - * - * 33% 16% 22% 20% * 34% 48%
At Masters GL Standard 18% 13% 14% 44% - * - * 18% 3% 10% 13% * 17% 24%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 74 8 48 15 - * - * 61 20 28 7 * 58 16
At Meets GL Standard or Above 38 4 22 12 - * - * 29 5 9 3 * 28 10
At Masters GL Standard 19 2 10 7 - * - * 16 1 4 2 * 14 5
Total Tests 104 15 69 16 - * - * 88 32 41 15 * 83 21
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% 100% 100% 100% - * - * 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 84% 73% 84% 100% - * - * 83% 78% 83% 60% * 83% 86%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 42% 33% 35% 88% - * - * 40% 25% 29% 20% * 40% 52%
At Masters GL Standard 16% 13% 12% 44% - * - * 15% 0% 7% 13% * 14% 24%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 87 11 58 16 - * - * 73 25 34 9 * 69 18
At Meets GL Standard or Above 44 5 24 14 - * - * 35 8 12 3 * 33 11
At Masters GL Standard 17 2 8 7 - * - * 13 0 3 2 * 12 5
Total Tests 104 15 69 16 - * - * 88 32 41 15 * 83 21
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - * 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 100% 100% 100% 100% - * - * 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2019 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting