2019 Accountability Reports
Accountability Rating Overall Summary A-F Accountability Campus Listing Accountability Ratings Domain Overview
STAAR Performance College, Career, and Military Readiness Graduation Rate
Academic Growth Relative Performance
Closing the Gaps Identification of Schools for Improvement
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth (AG) Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the Gaps (CTG) Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation Summary Campus Comparison Group
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness Indicators
STAAR Performance
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]
 
  Texas Education Agency  
2019 STAAR Performance
DYER EL (061905101) - KRUM ISD - DENTON COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social
Studies		 Totals Percentages
Total Tests 136 136 - - - 272
Approaches GL or Above 97 97 - - - 194 71%
Meets GL or Above 51 46 - - - 97 36%
Masters GL 25 17 - - - 42 15%
Total Percentage Points - 122%
Component Score - 41

Data Table


  All
Students		 African
American		 Hispanic White American
Indian		 Asian Pacific
Islander		 Two or
More
Races		 Econ
Disadv		 EB/EL
(Current)		 EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)		 Special
Ed
(Current)		 Special
Ed
(Former)		 Continu-
ously
Enrolled		 Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 71% 88% 55% 80% - - - 93% 58% 33% 37% 53% * 71% 73%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 36% 50% 22% 44% - - - 43% 22% 11% 16% 14% * 35% 38%
At Masters GL Standard 15% 25% 11% 19% - - - 7% 11% 0% 3% 3% * 14% 21%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 194 7 56 118 - - - 13 70 12 14 35 * 159 35
At Meets GL Standard or Above 97 4 22 65 - - - 6 26 4 6 9 * 79 18
At Masters GL Standard 42 2 11 28 - - - 1 13 0 1 2 * 32 10
Total Tests 272 8 102 148 - - - 14 120 36 38 66 * 224 48
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% 100% 100% 100% - * - 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%
% participation 2018-19 99% 100% 100% 99% - - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% * 99% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 71% * 53% 81% - - - 86% 55% 39% 42% 48% * 71% 75%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 38% * 25% 46% - - - 29% 20% 11% 16% 12% * 37% 42%
At Masters GL Standard 18% * 16% 20% - - - 14% 13% 0% 5% 3% * 17% 25%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 97 * 27 60 - - - ** 33 7 8 16 * 79 18
At Meets GL Standard or Above 51 * 13 34 - - - ** 12 2 3 4 * 41 10
At Masters GL Standard 25 * 8 15 - - - ** 8 0 1 1 * 19 6
Total Tests 136 * 51 74 - - - ** 60 18 19 33 * 112 24
Participation
% participation 2017-18 99% * 100% 99% - * - * 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97%
% participation 2018-19 99% 100% 100% 99% - - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% * 99% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 71% * 57% 78% - - - 100% 62% 28% 32% 58% * 71% 71%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 34% * 18% 42% - - - 57% 23% 11% 16% 15% * 34% 33%
At Masters GL Standard 13% * 6% 18% - - - 0% 8% 0% 0% 3% * 12% 17%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 97 * 29 58 - - - ** 37 5 6 19 * 80 17
At Meets GL Standard or Above 46 * 9 31 - - - ** 14 2 3 5 * 38 8
At Masters GL Standard 17 * 3 13 - - - ** 5 0 0 1 * 13 4
Total Tests 136 * 51 74 - - - ** 60 18 19 33 * 112 24
Participation
% participation 2017-18 100% * 100% 100% - * - * 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
% participation 2018-19 99% 100% 100% 99% - - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% * 99% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2019 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting