Texas Education Agency  
2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Summary
EDNA H S (120901001) - EDNA ISD - JACKSON COUNTY

Group State District Campus Ever Enrolled
In College
Ever Enrolled,
No Certification
or Degree
Never Found
in College
Level 1
Certificate
Earned
Level 2
Certificate
Earned
Industry-based
Certification
Earned
Graduated with
2 Year Degree
Graduated with
4 Year Degree
Class of 2017
Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% 46.0% 41.0% 43.8% 25.0% 56.3% * 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% 54.0% 59.0% 80.4% 26.1% 19.6% * 0.0% 0.0% ** **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.4% 25.6% 34.6% * 0.0% 0.0% 10.3% 25.6%
Class of 2016
Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 57.7% 54.5% 50.0% 29.2% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ** 10.4%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% 42.3% 45.5% 70.0% 30.0% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 30.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 59.1% 29.6% 40.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.2% 19.3%
Class of 2015
Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 34.3% 31.5% 44.8% 27.6% 55.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 65.7% 68.5% 69.8% 27.0% 30.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ** **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 62.0% 27.2% 38.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.9% 23.9%
Class of 2014
Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% 34.6% 34.6% 54.1% 43.2% 46.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% 65.4% 65.4% 61.4% 20.0% 38.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ** **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 58.9% 28.0% 41.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.2% 18.7%
Class of 2013
Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 50.5% 50.5% 44.2% 32.7% 55.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 49.5% 49.5% 80.4% 35.3% 19.6% 0.0% * 0.0% ** **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 62.1% 34.0% 37.9% 0.0% * 0.0% 9.7% 17.5%
Class of 2012
Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 39.5% 39.5% 53.1% 43.8% 43.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 60.5% 60.5% 77.6% 34.7% 22.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ** **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 67.9% 38.3% 30.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.1% 14.8%
Class of 2011
Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 39.4% 39.4% 41.5% 31.7% 58.5% * * 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 60.6% 60.6% 81.0% 38.1% 19.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ** **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.4% 35.6% 34.6% * * 0.0% 10.6% 17.3%
Class of 2010
Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% 32.3% 32.3% 59.4% 50.0% 40.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% 67.7% 67.7% 68.7% 43.3% 31.3% * 0.0% 0.0% * **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.7% 45.5% 34.3% * 0.0% 0.0% * 16.2%
Class of 2009
Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 26.3% 26.3% 42.3% 30.8% 57.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 73.7% 73.7% 82.2% 42.5% 17.8% * * 0.0% ** **
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.7% 39.4% 28.3% * * 0.0% 11.1% 18.2%
Class of 2008
Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 25.3% 25.3% 48.0% 44.0% 52.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 74.7% 74.7% 82.4% 44.6% 17.6% * * 0.0% * 27.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 73.7% 44.4% 26.3% * * 0.0% 5.1% 20.2%

  Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC).
- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size)
n/a Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

      TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting