Texas Education Agency  
2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Yearly Details
MCLEAN SCHOOL (090903001) - MCLEAN ISD - GRAY COUNTY

Years Out
From
Graduation
Group State District Campus Enrolled In
College
Continued
College
Enrollment
Not Found
in College
Level 1
Certificate
Earned
Level 2
Certificate
Earned
Industry-based
Certification
Earned
Graduated
with
2 Year
Degree
Graduated
with
4 Year
Degree
Class of 2023
1 Economically Disadvantaged 53.5% 46.2% 46.2% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 46.5% 53.8% 53.8% ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 69.2% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2022
1 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% - - 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% - - 66.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 61.5% - * 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% - - 66.7% 66.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 61.5% 61.5% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Class of 2021
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% - - * - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% - - ** - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 80.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% - - ** ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% 60.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.5% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.5% - - ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2020
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - ** - ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 58.8% - 41.2% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - * * ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 41.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - 0.0% 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 41.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - * 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * 0.0% 41.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2019
1 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - * - * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.3% - * 0.0% * 0.0% * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - * * * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - ** ** * * 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 38.9% 33.3% * * 0.0% 0.0% * *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 50.6% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 49.4% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2018
1 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 42.9% 42.9% 83.3% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 57.1% 57.1% 62.5% - * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.4% - * 0.0% 0.0% * * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 42.9% 42.9% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 57.1% 57.1% ** * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 57.1% 42.9% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 42.9% 42.9% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 57.1% 57.1% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 42.9% 42.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 42.9% 42.9% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 57.1% 57.1% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 42.9% 35.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 42.9% 42.9% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 57.1% 57.1% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 35.7% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 48.0% 42.9% 42.9% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.0% 57.1% 57.1% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2017
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% - - * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% - - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% - 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% - - ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% 53.3% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% - - ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% 53.3% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% - - 66.7% 66.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% 53.3% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.6% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.4% - - * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 40.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2016
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% - - 0.0% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% - - 100.0% - 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.4% - * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% - - 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 35.7% 35.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.7% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2015
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 33.3% 33.3% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 66.7% 66.7% ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 73.3% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 33.3% 33.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 66.7% 66.7% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% 53.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 33.3% 33.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 66.7% 66.7% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 40.0% 40.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 33.3% 33.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 66.7% 66.7% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 33.3% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 33.3% 33.3% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 66.7% 66.7% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.2% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.8% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2014
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% - - * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% - - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% - - ** ** * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 78.6% 78.6% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% - - ** ** * 0.0% * 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71.4% 71.4% * 0.0% * 0.0% * *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% - - ** * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 42.9% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 35.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.0% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.0% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2013
1 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 53.8% 53.8% * - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 46.2% 46.2% * - * * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.2% - 53.9% * 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 53.8% 53.8% * * ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 46.2% 46.2% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 53.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 53.8% 53.8% * * ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 46.2% 46.2% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 53.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 53.8% 53.8% * * ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 46.2% 46.2% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 53.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 53.8% 53.8% 0.0% 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 46.2% 46.2% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 53.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 47.4% 53.8% 53.8% 0.0% 0.0% ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 52.6% 46.2% 46.2% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 53.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2012
1 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 50.0% 50.0% 85.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 50.0% 50.0% 85.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 50.0% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 50.0% 50.0% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 57.1% 57.1% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 50.0% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 50.0% 50.0% ** * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 57.1% 50.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 50.0% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 50.0% 50.0% ** ** * * 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 64.3% 57.1% * * 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 50.0% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 50.0% 50.0% * * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 42.9% 42.9% * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 46.4% 50.0% 50.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 53.6% 50.0% 50.0% * * * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% * 0.0% * 0.0%
Class of 2011
1 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 47.1% 47.1% * - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 52.9% 52.9% ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.9% - 47.1% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 47.1% 47.1% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 52.9% 52.9% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 41.2% 41.2% 47.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 47.1% 47.1% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 52.9% 52.9% ** ** * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 47.1% 41.2% 41.2% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 47.1% 47.1% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 52.9% 52.9% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 35.3% 29.4% 35.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 47.1% 47.1% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 52.9% 52.9% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 35.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 44.8% 47.1% 47.1% * 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 55.2% 52.9% 52.9% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 35.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Class of 2010
1 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - * - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 73.3% - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.7% 46.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 41.8% - - 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 58.2% - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2009
1 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 40.0% 40.0% * - ** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 60.0% 60.0% ** - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% - 46.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 60.0% 60.0% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% 46.7% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 60.0% 60.0% ** ** * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 46.7% 46.7% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
4 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 60.0% 60.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% * 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 60.0% 60.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
6 Economically Disadvantaged 38.6% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 61.4% 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Class of 2008
1 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 40.0% 40.0% * - * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 60.0% 60.0% ** - * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% - 46.7% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 60.0% 60.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 53.3% 40.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 60.0% 60.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0%
4 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 60.0% 60.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% * 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *
5 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 40.0% 40.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 60.0% 60.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% * * * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6 Economically Disadvantaged 35.3% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged 64.7% 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All Students 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

  Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC).
- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size)
n/a Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

      TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting