| Texas Education Agency | |||
| 2023-24 Postsecondary Outcomes Summary | |||
| FRANKSTON H S (001904001) - FRANKSTON ISD - ANDERSON COUNTY | |||
| Group | State | District | Campus | Ever Enrolled In College |
Ever Enrolled, No Certification or Degree |
Never Found in College |
Level 1 Certificate Earned |
Level 2 Certificate Earned |
Industry-based Certification Earned |
Graduated with 2 Year Degree |
Graduated with 4 Year Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class of 2017 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.6% | 46.3% | 46.3% | 20.0% | * | 80.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.4% | 53.7% | 53.7% | 69.0% | ** | 31.0% | 0.0% | * | 0.0% | ** | * |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 46.3% | 20.4% | 53.7% | 0.0% | * | 0.0% | 14.8% | 9.3% |
| Class of 2016 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.3% | 48.0% | 48.0% | 58.3% | 29.2% | 41.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.7% | 52.0% | 52.0% | 69.2% | 38.5% | 30.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ** | * |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 64.0% | 34.0% | 36.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.0% | 12.0% |
| Class of 2015 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 58.1% | 58.1% | 60.0% | 36.0% | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ** | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.8% | 41.9% | 41.9% | 83.3% | 50.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 69.8% | 41.9% | 30.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 16.3% | 11.6% |
| Class of 2014 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.0% | 56.1% | 56.1% | 68.8% | 56.3% | 31.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 0.0% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.0% | 43.9% | 43.9% | 72.0% | 32.0% | 28.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 32.0% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 70.2% | 45.6% | 29.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.8% | 14.0% |
| Class of 2013 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 47.4% | 46.0% | 46.0% | 56.5% | 34.8% | ** | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 52.6% | 54.0% | 54.0% | 85.2% | 51.9% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ** | * |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 72.0% | 44.0% | 28.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 16.0% | 12.0% |
| Class of 2012 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46.4% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 53.6% | 35.7% | 46.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 53.6% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 78.6% | 46.4% | 21.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 66.1% | 41.1% | 33.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| Class of 2011 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 44.8% | 48.2% | 48.2% | 59.3% | 29.6% | 40.7% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 22.2% |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 55.2% | 51.8% | 51.8% | 72.4% | 48.3% | 27.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 17.2% |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 66.1% | 39.3% | 33.9% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 19.6% |
| Class of 2010 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 41.8% | 36.2% | 36.2% | 61.9% | 38.1% | 38.1% | 0.0% | * | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 58.2% | 63.8% | 63.8% | 62.2% | 32.4% | 37.8% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | ** |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 62.1% | 34.5% | 37.9% | * | * | 0.0% | * | 20.7% |
| Class of 2009 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 38.6% | 55.2% | 55.2% | 59.4% | 34.4% | 40.6% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | ** |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 61.4% | 44.8% | 44.8% | 61.5% | 34.6% | 38.5% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 60.3% | 34.5% | 39.7% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 13.8% |
| Class of 2008 | |||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | 35.3% | 37.7% | 37.7% | 65.0% | 40.0% | 35.0% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| Non-Economically Disadvantaged | 64.7% | 62.3% | 62.3% | 63.6% | 45.5% | 36.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | * |
| All Students | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 64.2% | 43.4% | 35.9% | * | 0.0% | 0.0% | * | 11.3% |
| Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC). | |
| - | Indicates there are no students in the group. |
| * | Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. |
| ** | When only one student assessment group is masked, then the second smallest student assessment group is masked (regardless of size) |
| n/a | Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. |
| TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting | |||