2022 Accountability Reports
Accountability Rating Overall Summary A-F Accountability Listing Accountability Ratings Domain Overview
STAAR Performance College, Career, and Military Readiness Graduation Rate
Academic Growth Relative Performance
Closing the Gaps Identification of Schools for Improvement
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth (AG) Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the Gaps (CTG) Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation Summary Campus Comparison Group
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness Indicators
STAAR Performance
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]
 
  Texas Education Agency  
2022 STAAR Performance
ARMSTRONG EL (170902107) - CONROE ISD - MONTGOMERY COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Science Social
Studies		 Totals Percentages
Total Tests 187 191 - - 378
Approaches GL or Above 131 129 - - 260 69%
Meets GL or Above 71 66 - - 137 36%
Masters GL 32 27 - - 59 16%
Total Percentage Points 121%
Component Score 40

Data Table


  All
Students		 African
American		 Hispanic White American
Indian		 Asian Pacific
Islander		 Two or
More
Races		 Econ
Disadv		 EB/EL
(Current)		 EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)		 Special
Ed
(Current)		 Special
Ed
(Former)		 Continu-
ously
Enrolled		 Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 69% 55% 70% 79% * - - * 69% 69% 69% 34% 38% 68% 70%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 36% 27% 36% 57% * - - * 36% 36% 36% 14% 13% 34% 45%
At Masters GL Standard 16% 14% 15% 25% * - - * 15% 16% 16% 7% 0% 13% 27%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 260 31 203 22 * - - * 248 141 141 25 3 208 52
At Meets GL Standard or Above 137 15 105 16 * - - * 129 73 73 10 1 104 33
At Masters GL Standard 59 8 43 7 * - - * 54 32 32 5 0 39 20
Total Tests 378 56 289 28 * - - * 362 205 205 73 8 304 74
Participation
% participation 2020-21 98% 90% 100% 96% - - - 100% 98% 100% 100% 96% * 98% 99%
% participation 2021-22 99% 100% 100% 90% * - - * 99% 100% 100% 99% 100% 98% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 70% 61% 71% 79% - - - * 70% 66% 66% 31% * 69% 76%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 38% 32% 37% 64% - - - * 37% 33% 33% 14% * 35% 51%
At Masters GL Standard 17% 21% 16% 21% - - - * 16% 16% 16% 6% * 14% 30%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 131 17 101 ** - - - * 125 67 67 11 * 103 28
At Meets GL Standard or Above 71 9 53 ** - - - * 67 33 33 5 * 52 19
At Masters GL Standard 32 6 23 ** - - - * 28 16 16 2 * 21 11
Total Tests 187 28 143 ** - - - * 179 101 101 36 * 150 37
Participation
% participation 2020-21 99% 92% 100% 95% - - - * 99% 100% 100% 97% * 98% 100%
% participation 2021-22 99% 100% 99% 90% * - - * 99% 100% 100% 97% * 98% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 68% 50% 70% 79% * - - * 67% 71% 71% 38% * 68% 65%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 35% 21% 36% 50% * - - * 34% 38% 38% 14% * 34% 38%
At Masters GL Standard 14% 7% 14% 29% * - - * 14% 15% 15% 8% * 12% 24%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 129 14 102 11 * - - * 123 74 74 14 * 105 24
At Meets GL Standard or Above 66 6 52 7 * - - * 62 40 40 5 * 52 14
At Masters GL Standard 27 2 20 4 * - - * 26 16 16 3 * 18 9
Total Tests 191 28 146 14 * - - * 183 104 104 37 * 154 37
Participation
% participation 2020-21 99% 92% 100% 95% - - - * 99% 100% 100% 97% * 98% 100%
% participation 2021-22 99% 100% 100% 90% * - - * 99% 100% 100% 100% * 99% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2022 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting