2022 Accountability Reports
Accountability Rating Overall Summary A-F Accountability Campus Listing Accountability Ratings Domain Overview
STAAR Performance College, Career, and Military Readiness Graduation Rate
Academic Growth Relative Performance
Closing the Gaps Identification of Schools for Improvement
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Top 25 Percent: Comparative Academic Growth (AG) Top 25 Percent: Comparative Closing the Gaps (CTG) Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation Summary Campus Comparison Group
Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading Academic Achievement in Mathematics Academic Achievement in Science Academic Achievement in Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness Indicators
STAAR Performance
STAAR Performance STAAR Comparison School / District Comparison CCMR Academic Growth Graduation Correlate
Accountability Reports Federal Report Card School Report Card Snapshot Report Texas Academic Performance Report [TAPR] Texas Performance Reporting System [TPRS]
 
  Texas Education Agency  
2022 STAAR Performance
MILAM EL (170902105) - CONROE ISD - MONTGOMERY COUNTY

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Calculation Report


STAAR Performance Reading Mathematics Science Social
Studies		 Totals Percentages
Total Tests 165 164 - - 329
Approaches GL or Above 122 124 - - 246 75%
Meets GL or Above 65 67 - - 132 40%
Masters GL 38 30 - - 68 21%
Total Percentage Points 136%
Component Score 45

Data Table


  All
Students		 African
American		 Hispanic White American
Indian		 Asian Pacific
Islander		 Two or
More
Races		 Econ
Disadv		 EB/EL
(Current)		 EB/EL
(Current &
Monitored)		 Special
Ed
(Current)		 Special
Ed
(Former)		 Continu-
ously
Enrolled		 Non-
Continu-
ously
Enrolled
All Subjects
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 75% 50% 76% 75% * - - 75% 71% 79% 79% 53% 73% 73% 79%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 40% 30% 42% 39% * - - 50% 38% 44% 44% 20% 32% 38% 46%
At Masters GL Standard 21% 20% 18% 23% * - - 25% 18% 17% 17% 2% 18% 18% 28%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 246 5 110 123 * - - ** 186 84 84 24 16 183 63
At Meets GL Standard or Above 132 3 61 63 * - - ** 99 47 47 9 7 95 37
At Masters GL Standard 68 2 26 37 * - - ** 47 18 18 1 4 46 22
Total Tests 329 10 144 163 * - - ** 261 106 106 45 22 249 80
Participation
% participation 2020-21 98% 100% 99% 96% - 100% - 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 92% 98% 97%
% participation 2021-22 99% 100% 99% 98% * - - 100% 98% 100% 100% 95% 100% 98% 100%
ELA/Reading
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 74% 40% 76% 74% * - - * 69% 79% 79% 57% 64% 73% 78%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 39% 40% 43% 37% * - - * 37% 42% 42% 13% 27% 38% 45%
At Masters GL Standard 23% 20% 21% 24% * - - * 21% 21% 21% 0% 18% 22% 28%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 122 2 55 61 * - - * 91 42 42 13 7 91 31
At Meets GL Standard or Above 65 2 31 30 * - - * 48 22 22 3 3 47 18
At Masters GL Standard 38 1 15 20 * - - * 27 11 11 0 2 27 11
Total Tests 165 5 72 82 * - - * 131 53 53 23 11 125 40
Participation
% participation 2020-21 98% * 99% 96% - * - * 98% 100% 100% 100% 90% 98% 97%
% participation 2021-22 99% 100% 99% 99% * - - * 99% 100% 100% 96% 100% 99% 100%
Mathematics
Percent of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 76% 60% 76% 77% * - - * 73% 79% 79% 50% 82% 74% 80%
At Meets GL Standard or Above 41% 20% 42% 41% * - - * 39% 47% 47% 27% 36% 39% 48%
At Masters GL Standard 18% 20% 15% 21% * - - * 15% 13% 13% 5% 18% 15% 28%
Number of Tests
At Approaches GL Standard or Above 124 3 55 62 * - - * 95 42 42 11 9 92 32
At Meets GL Standard or Above 67 1 30 33 * - - * 51 25 25 6 4 48 19
At Masters GL Standard 30 1 11 17 * - - * 20 7 7 1 2 19 11
Total Tests 164 5 72 81 * - - * 130 53 53 22 11 124 40
Participation
% participation 2020-21 97% * 98% 96% - * - * 98% 99% 99% 100% 90% 98% 97%
% participation 2021-22 98% 100% 99% 98% * - - * 98% 100% 100% 93% 100% 98% 100%

- Indicates there are no students in the group.
* Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality.
** When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked regardless of size.

     Released August 2022 TEA | Analytics, Assessment, and Reporting | Performance Reporting